DOJ-OGR-00010198.jpg

478 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal correspondence / court filing (page 14 of 14)
File Size: 478 KB
Summary

This document is the final page (page 14) of a legal letter dated March 7, 2013, from attorney Paul Shechtman of Zuckerman Spaeder LLP to Judge William H. Pauley, III. The text concludes an argument regarding sentencing, specifically referencing *Gall v. United States* to argue that non-incarcerative sentences (probation) are still severe and restrictive. The letter is copied to Assistant US Attorneys Stanley J. Okula, Jr. and Nanette Davis.

People (4)

Name Role Context
William H. Pauley, III Judge
Addressee of the letter (The Honorable)
Paul Shechtman Attorney
Author of the letter, representing the defense (Zuckerman Spaeder LLP)
Stanley J. Okula, Jr. Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA)
Copied (cc) on the letter
Nanette Davis Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA)
Copied (cc) on the letter

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Zuckerman Spaeder LLP
Letterhead organization
Supreme Court
Referenced in footnote regarding Gall v. United States
DOJ
Department of Justice (implied by DOJ-OGR footer and AUSA titles)

Timeline (1 events)

2013-03-07
Submission of legal correspondence regarding sentencing context
New York (implied by Judge Pauley's jurisdiction)

Relationships (2)

Paul Shechtman Attorney-Judge William H. Pauley, III
Shechtman submitting legal arguments to Judge Pauley
Paul Shechtman Opposing Counsel Stanley J. Okula, Jr.
Shechtman cc'ing AUSA Okula

Key Quotes (3)

"has done, and his immediate misconduct assessed in the context of his overall life hitherto, it should be at the moment of his sentencing"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010198.jpg
Quote #1
"custodial sentences are qualitatively more severe than probationary sentences of equivalent terms."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010198.jpg
Quote #2
"Offenders on probation are nonetheless subject to several standard conditions that substantially restrict their liberty."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010198.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document