Trove
Sign In Sign Up

NANETTE DAVIS

Person
Mentions
10
Relationships
0
Events
2
Documents
5
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
No relationships found for this entity.
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Oral argument on defendant Parse's motion for a new trial. Open Court View
2012-10-12 Court proceeding A court proceeding for the case United States of America v. David K. Parse, case number 09 CR 581... United States District Cour... View

DOJ-OGR-00010198.jpg

This document is the final page (page 14) of a legal letter dated March 7, 2013, from attorney Paul Shechtman of Zuckerman Spaeder LLP to Judge William H. Pauley, III. The text concludes an argument regarding sentencing, specifically referencing *Gall v. United States* to argue that non-incarcerative sentences (probation) are still severe and restrictive. The letter is copied to Assistant US Attorneys Stanley J. Okula, Jr. and Nanette Davis.

Legal correspondence / court filing (page 14 of 14)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00010159.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript in the case 'United States of America v. David Parse.' It records the opening of oral arguments regarding Parse's motion for a new trial based on ineffective assistance of counsel. Defense attorney Paul Shechtman and prosecutors Nanette Davis and Stanley J. Okula, Jr. are present. While part of a larger batch of documents (indicated by the DOJ-OGR Bates stamp) often associated with Epstein-related releases, the text specifically concerns the trial of David Parse.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00010158.jpg

This document is the cover page for a court transcript from a proceeding on October 12, 2012, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The case is United States of America v. David K. Parse, with Judge William H. Pauley III presiding. The document lists the legal counsel for both the prosecution, led by U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara, and the defense, represented by Paul Shechtman of Zuckerman Spaeder.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009519.jpg

This document is the final page (page 14) of a legal letter dated March 7, 2013, sent by attorney Paul Shechtman of Zuckerman Spaeder LLP to Judge William H. Pauley, III. The text concludes an argument regarding sentencing, specifically utilizing a footnote citing 'Gall v. United States' to argue that non-incarcerative (probationary) sentences still constitute a significant restriction of liberty. The document was originally filed in 2013 but was later submitted as Exhibit A-5943 in the 2022 Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN).

Legal correspondence / court filing exhibit
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009480.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript filed on February 24, 2022, as part of a larger filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, which corresponds to the Ghislaine Maxwell case). However, the content of the transcript records proceedings for 'United States of America v. David Parse,' where attorney Paul Shechtman argues for a new trial based on 'ineffective assistance of counsel.' This transcript was likely submitted in the Maxwell case as legal precedent or an exhibit regarding standards for new trials.

Court transcript (exhibit)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search