HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017751.jpg
2.56 MB
Extraction Summary
3
People
5
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document / law review article
File Size:
2.56 MB
Summary
This document is page 37 of 52 from a legal filing, specifically an excerpt from a 2005 BYU Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The text argues for victims' rights to access presentence reports and be heard at sentencing, countering arguments made by the 'Practitioners' Group' (defense attorneys). The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen at the bottom and a House Oversight Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production related to a congressional investigation.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| David Schoen | Attorney / Submitter |
Name appears at the bottom of the page, indicating he is likely the attorney submitting this document or the author o...
|
| Amy Baron-Evans | Attorney / Author |
Mentioned in footnote 262 as the author of a letter cited in the text.
|
| Douglas E. Beloof | Author |
Cited in footnote 262 for his work 'Constitutional Implications of Crime Victims as Participants'.
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners' Group |
A group of defense attorneys whose letter regarding victim access to presentence reports is being critiqued.
|
|
| Congress |
Mentioned regarding the legislative intent of victim's rights.
|
|
| Senate Judiciary Committee |
Reports from 2000 and 2003 are cited in the footnotes.
|
|
| BYU Law Review |
The source publication of the text (2005 B.Y.U.L. Rev. 835).
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied recipient of the document via the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2005
Publication of the BYU Law Review article.
BYU Law Review
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in footnote 268 regarding District of Utah Criminal Local Rules.
|
Relationships (1)
David Schoen's name appears on the document which bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, typical of the Epstein document production.
Key Quotes (3)
"Most important, the Practitioners' Group's letter fails to consider the impact of denying the victim access to the presentence report on the victim's right to fairness."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017751.jpg
Quote #1
"But victims now also have due process rights during sentencing, which make it clear that they should receive the same information."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017751.jpg
Quote #2
"Victims always have a particularized need for access to the Guidelines calculations"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017751.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document