BYU Law Review
OrganizationRelationship Network
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017760.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 BYU Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and the inherent power of courts to appoint counsel for indigent victims. It cites various legal precedents (such as Bothwell v. Republic Tobacco Co.) to argue that victims require legal representation to ensure a fair process, as neither prosecutors nor defendants prioritize victim rights. The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen in the footer and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, suggesting it was submitted by Schoen (who represented Jeffrey Epstein) as part of congressional inquiries or legal arguments regarding victim representation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017755.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a 2005 BYU Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically focusing on a victim's right to attend court proceedings and be heard. The text analyzes the rationale behind allowing victims to be present during trials and cites various state constitutions and federal rules (Rule 615). The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen in the footer and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was used as legal research or an exhibit in proceedings related to the investigation of the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, likely concerning the violation of victims' rights.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017754.jpg
This document is page 40 of 52 from a legal text, specifically citing the 2005 BYU Law Review, discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It proposes amendments to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 32 and 43.1 to expand victims' rights regarding sentencing recommendations and attendance at trials. The document bears the name David Schoen (Epstein's attorney) and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017751.jpg
This document is page 37 of 52 from a legal filing, specifically an excerpt from a 2005 BYU Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The text argues for victims' rights to access presentence reports and be heard at sentencing, countering arguments made by the 'Practitioners' Group' (defense attorneys). The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen at the bottom and a House Oversight Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production related to a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017748.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 BYU Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and federal sentencing procedures. It details the rights of victims to access presentence reports and be heard regarding sentencing guidelines, citing Senator Kyl and various legal precedents. The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, indicating it was likely submitted as a legal exhibit or research material during congressional inquiries related to the Epstein case (Schoen was one of Epstein's attorneys).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017742.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a 2005 BYU Law Review article (page 28 of a 52-page production) included in a file by attorney David Schoen for the House Oversight Committee. The text outlines legal arguments regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), quoting Senator Kyl and citing case law (State v. Timmendequas) to argue that victims have a due process right to be heard, particularly regarding venue transfer decisions, to minimize their inconvenience and trauma.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017740.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 BYU Law Review article, attributed to attorney David Schoen, discussing proposed amendments to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (Rules 18, 20, and 21). The text argues for integrating the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) into these rules, specifically requiring courts and U.S. Attorneys to consider victims' views and objections before transferring cases between districts. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, indicating its inclusion in a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017715.jpg
This document is the first page of a 2005 law review article by Paul G. Cassell titled 'Recognizing Victims in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure'. It discusses the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) of 2004 and proposes amendments to federal rules to better integrate victims into criminal proceedings. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp and the name 'DAVID SCHOEN' in the footer, suggesting it is part of a production related to congressional oversight, likely involving the Epstein case where the CVRA was a central legal issue.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014080.jpg
This document is page 101 of a 2014 legal text (likely a law review article) discussing 'Crime Victims' Rights.' It analyzes the nuances of state statutes (Indiana, Louisiana, Idaho, Delaware) regarding when victims' rights attach, specifically debating whether rights exist before formal charges are filed. The page includes extensive footnotes citing various state codes and legal precedents. It is marked with a House Oversight Committee stamp, suggesting it was included in discovery or research related to the Epstein case, likely regarding the federal Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and the non-prosecution agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014043.jpg
This document is a page from a legal academic text (specifically 'Vol. 104' likely by Paul Cassell) bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. It discusses the history of the Crime Victims' Rights movement, specifically the push for a U.S. Constitutional amendment following the success of state-level bills of rights. It details a 1996 Rose Garden ceremony attended by President Bill Clinton in support of such an amendment. The text appears to be part of the legislative or legal background materials often associated with Paul Cassell's representation of Epstein victims regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA).
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity