DOJ-OGR-00021027.jpg
609 KB
Extraction Summary
8
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal court filing / order denying motion
File Size:
609 KB
Summary
This document is page 44 of a court order (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on April 29, 2022, denying the Defendant's (Ghislaine Maxwell) Rule 29 motion to vacate convictions. The court rejects arguments regarding prejudice due to absent deceased witnesses (including Jeffrey Epstein, his mother, Michael Casey, and Detective Joseph Recarey) and claims of pre-indictment delay. The text references evidence establishing the Defendant's close work with an individual named Markham on a manual and checklists.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Defendant | Defendant |
Ghislaine Maxwell (implied by case citation Maxwell, 534 F. Supp. 3d); subject of the Rule 29 motion denial.
|
| Juan Alessi | Witness |
Provided testimony at trial.
|
| Markham | Associate |
Worked closely with the Defendant to create a manual/checklists.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Deceased potential witness |
Mentioned as an absent witness causing alleged prejudice.
|
| Epstein's mother | Deceased potential witness |
Mentioned as an absent witness causing alleged prejudice.
|
| Jane | Victim/Witness |
Mentioned in relation to her talent agent.
|
| Michael Casey | Talent Agent |
Jane's talent agent; listed as a deceased potential witness.
|
| Joseph Recarey | Detective |
Palm Beach Police Department Detective; listed as a deceased potential witness.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Palm Beach Police Department |
Employer of Detective Joseph Recarey.
|
|
| The Court |
Judicial body issuing the order.
|
|
| The Government |
Prosecution.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2022-04-29
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of the Police Department mentioned.
|
Relationships (2)
Worked closely together to create a manual and checklists.
Text refers to 'Jane's talent agent Michael Casey'.
Key Quotes (3)
"evidence presented at trial, including the testimony of Juan Alessi and an email chain between the Defendant and Markham that indicates that the Defendant worked closely with Markham to create the manual and provided specific content, such as the checklists"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021027.jpg
Quote #1
"The Court therefore denies her motion to vacate her convictions on this basis."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021027.jpg
Quote #2
"The Court denies the Defendant’s Rule 29 motion because the jury’s guilty verdicts were supported by the witness testimony and documentary evidence presented at trial."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021027.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document