DOJ-OGR-00019352.jpg
693 KB
Extraction Summary
12
People
6
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
0
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal brief / court filing (appellate)
File Size:
693 KB
Summary
This document is page 10 of a legal filing (Case 20-3061, dated September 16, 2020) related to United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Second Circuit. The text consists of legal arguments regarding the 'collateral-order doctrine' and cites multiple Supreme Court precedents (such as Stack v. Boyle and Sell v. United States) to define when pretrial orders in criminal cases can be appealed immediately. The document argues that exceptions allowing for interlocutory appeals are rare.
People (12)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Robinson | Case Citation Subject |
Cited in States v. Robinson
|
| Cohen | Case Citation Subject |
Referenced regarding the 'Cohen' legal doctrine
|
| Stack | Case Citation Subject |
Cited in Stack v. Boyle
|
| Boyle | Case Citation Subject |
Cited in Stack v. Boyle
|
| Abney | Case Citation Subject |
Cited in Abney v. United States
|
| Helstoski | Case Citation Subject |
Cited in Helstoski v. Meanor
|
| Meanor | Case Citation Subject |
Cited in Helstoski v. Meanor
|
| Sell | Case Citation Subject |
Cited in Sell v. United States
|
| Van Cauwenberghe | Case Citation Subject |
Referenced regarding the 'Van Cauwenberghe criterion'
|
| Punn | Case Citation Subject |
Cited in United States v. Punn
|
| Chasser | Case Citation Subject |
Cited in Lauro Lines s.r.l. v. Chasser
|
| Carpenter | Case Citation Subject |
Cited in Mohawk Indus., Inc. v. Carpenter
|
Organizations (6)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Supreme Court |
Referenced regarding decisions on pretrial orders and interlocutory appeals
|
|
| 2d Cir. |
Second Circuit Court of Appeals, cited in case law
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice, implied by Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR'
|
|
| Midland Asphalt |
Company named in case citation
|
|
| Mohawk Indus., Inc. |
Company named in case citation
|
|
| Lauro Lines s.r.l. |
Company named in case citation
|
Key Quotes (3)
"In over 70 years since Cohen was decided... the Supreme Court has identified only four types of pretrial orders in criminal cases as satisfying the collateral-order doctrine"Source
DOJ-OGR-00019352.jpg
Quote #1
"In contrast, the circumstances in which the Supreme Court has 'refused to permit interlocutory appeals' in criminal cases have been 'far more numerous.'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00019352.jpg
Quote #2
"The justification for immediate appeal must . . . be sufficiently strong to overcome the usual benefits of deferring appeal until litigation concludes."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019352.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document