DOJ-OGR-00002829.jpg
721 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court order / legal opinion
File Size:
721 KB
Summary
This document is page 8 of a court order filed on March 26, 2021, in the case of United States v. Schulte (Case 1:17-cr-00548). The text addresses a legal dispute regarding 'Underrepresentation' in jury selection, specifically defining the 'Relevant Jury Venire.' The defendant (Schulte) argued for the use of the White Plains 'qualified wheel,' while the Government argued for the 'master wheel.' The Court ruled in favor of the Government, concluding that the White Plains master wheel is the relevant jury venire for the fair cross-section analysis.
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Government |
Prosecution; arguing for the use of the 'master wheel'.
|
|
| Supreme Court |
Referenced regarding lack of specific definition for 'relevant jury pool'.
|
|
| Second Circuit |
Appellate court referenced for case law (Rioux, Allen).
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (referenced in footer stamp DOJ-OGR-00002829).
|
Timeline (1 events)
2021-03-26
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of the jury wheel/venire in question (likely SDNY courthouse in White Plains).
|
|
|
Location of the cited Rioux case (D. Conn).
|
Relationships (1)
Legal dispute over jury pool selection (Schulte Br. vs Gov't Opp. Br.).
Key Quotes (3)
"The Court agrees with the Government."Source
DOJ-OGR-00002829.jpg
Quote #1
"Instead, the Court concludes that the White Plains master wheel is the relevant jury venire."Source
DOJ-OGR-00002829.jpg
Quote #2
"“Neither the Supreme Court nor the Second Circuit has defined the ‘relevant jury pool’ with any specificity.”"Source
DOJ-OGR-00002829.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document