DOJ-OGR-00022089.jpg

746 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

2
People
5
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal filing (court document/memorandum of law)
File Size: 746 KB
Summary

This page is from a legal filing (Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT) dated April 24, 2020, arguing against a motion by defendant Thomas (likely Michael Thomas, a guard involved in the Epstein case) to disclose draft versions of an Inspector General's Report regarding the Bureau of Prisons (BOP). The text argues that such drafts do not yet exist and, even if they did, would be protected by the 'deliberative process privilege.' The document cites numerous legal precedents to support the claim that pre-decisional government documents are shielded from discovery.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Thomas Defendant
Refers to Michael Thomas (prison guard charged in relation to Epstein's death); the document argues against his motio...
Inspector General Government Official/Investigator
Mentioned in relation to the 'Inspector General's Report' regarding the BOP.

Organizations (5)

Name Type Context
BOP
Bureau of Prisons; subject of potential reforms mentioned in the Inspector General's Report.
DOJ-OGR
Department of Justice - Office of Government Relations (implied by Bates stamp).
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York; the court jurisdiction cited in legal precedents.
Supreme Court
Cited in legal precedents (U.S.).
2nd Circuit Court of Appeals
Cited in legal precedents (2d Cir.).

Relationships (1)

Thomas Legal Adversary Government/BOP
Government filing arguing against Thomas's motion for disclosure.

Key Quotes (3)

"Thomas’s request for draft versions of the Report—which do not yet exist—fails for two additional reasons."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00022089.jpg
Quote #1
"First, drafts of the Inspector General’s Report, which has not been completed and will likely make recommendations about reforms at the BOP, are protected from disclosure under the deliberative process privilege..."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00022089.jpg
Quote #2
"The Inspector General’s Report is both pre-decisional and deliberative."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00022089.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document