DOJ-OGR-00003060.jpg

721 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

1
People
6
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court filing / legal memorandum
File Size: 721 KB
Summary

This document is page 126 of a legal filing (Document 204) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on April 16, 2021. It contains legal arguments regarding the 'state action' doctrine and the Fifth Amendment, specifically addressing whether a private entity acts as a government agent. The document explicitly argues that the law firm Boies Schiller is not an agent of the Government and that the defendant's claim fails for lack of demonstrated state action.

People (1)

Name Role Context
Defendant Defendant
Refers to Ghislaine Maxwell (based on Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE); the text argues her Fifth Amendment claim fails.

Organizations (6)

Name Type Context
Boies Schiller
Law firm mentioned in the discussion section; the document asserts it is not an agent of the Government.
Government
Refers to the U.S. Government/Prosecution in the context of state action and constitutional violations.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Cited as legal authority (2d Cir.).
Supreme Court of the United States
Cited as legal authority (U.S.).
Yonkers Sav. & Loan Ass'n
Cited in a legal case reference.
DOJ
Department of Justice (referenced in footer DOJ-OGR).

Relationships (2)

Boies Schiller Non-Agency Government
Text states: 'Boies Schiller is not an agent of the Government'
Defendant Adversarial/Legal Government
Context of the criminal case and Fifth Amendment claims.

Key Quotes (3)

"Boies Schiller is not an agent of the Government and has not been at any time during the course of the Government’s investigation"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00003060.jpg
Quote #1
"Non-government action is attributable to the government 'only when it can be said that the State is responsible for the specific conduct of which the [defendant] complains.'"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00003060.jpg
Quote #2
"the defendant’s Fifth Amendment claim fails because she has not demonstrated state action."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00003060.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document