DOJ-OGR-00009257.jpg
1 MB
Extraction Summary
10
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
4
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript (trial testimony)
File Size:
1 MB
Summary
This document is a transcript page from the trial *United States v. Daugerdas* (Feb 15, 2012), likely filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) to challenge the credibility of a juror (Catherine Conrad). The transcript details the cross-examination of Conrad regarding her suspension from the practice of law, her history of alcoholism, and her failure to disclose these facts to the court (specifically Judge Pauley). Several exhibits (PMD 14, 17, and 20) confirming her disciplinary history and medical issues are admitted into evidence during the questioning.
People (10)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Catherine Conrad | Witness/Lawyer/Juror |
Being questioned about her history of alcoholism, suspension from law practice, and previous testimony.
|
| Paul M. Daugerdas | Defendant |
Named in the case caption (United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas).
|
| Mr. Gair | Attorney |
Questioning the witness and moving exhibits into evidence.
|
| Mr. Okula | Attorney |
Counsel present, stating 'No objection' to exhibits.
|
| Judge Pauley | Judge |
Mentioned in questioning regarding whether he would have wanted to know about the witness's alcoholism.
|
| Presiding Justice Sachs | Judge |
Listed on the Supreme Court Appellate Division order (Exhibit 20).
|
| Justice Friedman | Judge |
Listed on the Supreme Court Appellate Division order.
|
| Justice Sweeney | Judge |
Listed on the Supreme Court Appellate Division order.
|
| Justice Nardelli | Judge |
Listed on the Supreme Court Appellate Division order.
|
| Justice McGuire | Judge |
Listed on the Supreme Court Appellate Division order.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States of America |
Plaintiff in the case.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters |
Court reporting service.
|
|
| Supreme Court Appellate Division |
Issued orders regarding Conrad's suspension; includes First Department.
|
|
| Departmental Disciplinary Committee |
Entity that took testimony from Conrad in 2009.
|
Timeline (4 events)
December 9, 2010
Order by Supreme Court Appellate Division (PMD Exhibit 20).
Supreme Court Appellate Division
February 15, 2012
Court testimony of witness Conrad in US v. Daugerdas.
Courtroom (likely SDNY)
March 29, 2009
Testimony of Catherine Conrad in disciplinary committee hearing (PMD Exhibit 17).
Supreme Court Appellate Division departmental disciplinary committee
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by 'Southern District Reporters' and the case caption style (SDNY).
|
Relationships (2)
Conrad was suspended from practice by the Appellate Division; described as having conduct that 'evinces a shocking disregard for the judicial system.'
Questioning implies Conrad may have withheld information from Judge Pauley during jury selection or proceedings.
Key Quotes (5)
"remission is remission"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009257.jpg
Quote #1
"evinces a shocking disregard for the judicial system"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009257.jpg
Quote #2
"One's never cured."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009257.jpg
Quote #3
"I don't think this is the proper forum to me to give a blank HIPAA authorization for the world, Judge."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009257.jpg
Quote #4
"It's the boilerplate First Department renderings."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009257.jpg
Quote #5
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document