Departmental Disciplinary Committee
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Catherine M. Conrad
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Catherine M. Conrad
|
Adversarial regulatory |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alan W. Friedberg
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-01-01 | Medical evaluation | The Committee obtained a psychiatric evaluation of respondent Catherine M. Conrad. | N/A | View |
| 2007-12-18 | Legal event | The Court suspended respondent Catherine M. Conrad from the practice of law for failure to respon... | First Judicial Department | View |
| 2007-12-18 | N/A | Court suspended respondent from practice of law for failure to respond to requests. | New York | View |
DOJ-OGR-00009257.jpg
This document is a transcript page from the trial *United States v. Daugerdas* (Feb 15, 2012), likely filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) to challenge the credibility of a juror (Catherine Conrad). The transcript details the cross-examination of Conrad regarding her suspension from the practice of law, her history of alcoholism, and her failure to disclose these facts to the court (specifically Judge Pauley). Several exhibits (PMD 14, 17, and 20) confirming her disciplinary history and medical issues are admitted into evidence during the questioning.
DOJ-OGR-00010124.jpg
This document is Page 2 of a 2010 New York court decision (Slip Op. 09090) regarding the suspension of attorney Catherine M. Conrad. The text details her suspension due to alcohol dependency and mental infirmity, denying her immediate reinstatement but converting her suspension to medical grounds. While part of a larger filing (Case 1:20-cv-03388-PAE) likely related to the Epstein/Maxwell litigation, this specific page serves as a legal precedent or exhibit regarding attorney conduct and fitness.
DOJ-OGR-00009926.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Ms. Conrad. The questioning focuses on her financial situation, including her assets of approximately $14,000, her past earnings as a lawyer, and her tax filing history. The attorney attempts to scrutinize her financial success and challenges the truthfulness of a prior affidavit she submitted to a disciplinary committee, while Ms. Conrad is often evasive in her answers.
DOJ-OGR-00009445.jpg
This legal document is a court order from the First Judicial Department regarding attorney Catherine M. Conrad. The court grants the Departmental Disciplinary Committee's motion to suspend Conrad indefinitely due to a medical disability related to her admitted alcohol dependency. The court denies Conrad's cross-motion for immediate reinstatement, stating she has not yet met the burden of proving her fitness to resume the practice of law.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity