DOJ-OGR-00000904.jpg

678 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal notice (notice of defective filing)
File Size: 678 KB
Summary

This is a Notice of Defective Filing from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding United States of America v. Maxwell (Case 21-770). Dated April 1, 2021, it notifies the defense that a 'Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel' submitted on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell on March 30, 2021, did not comply with Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (FRAP) or Local Rules. The document lists various potential reasons for the defect, though no specific reason is visually checked on this page.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Debra Ann Livingston Chief Judge
Listed in the header of the Court of Appeals document
Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe Clerk of Court
Listed in the header of the Court of Appeals document
Ghislaine Maxwell Appellant/Defendant
Subject of the case; filed a Notice of Appearance via counsel that was deemed defective
Nathan DC Judge
District Court Judge (Alison Nathan) referenced in the case details

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Issuing court
SDNY
Southern District of New York (District Court)
DOJ
Department of Justice (implied by footer DOJ-OGR)

Timeline (2 events)

2021-03-30
Submission of Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Ghislaine Maxwell Counsel (unnamed)
2021-04-01
Issuance of Notice of Defective Filing
New York, NY

Locations (2)

Location Context
Court address
Court address

Relationships (1)

United States of America Legal Adversaries Ghislaine Maxwell
Case Short Title: United States of America v. Maxwell

Key Quotes (2)

"On March 30, 2021 the Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel, on behalf of the Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell was submitted in the above referenced case."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000904.jpg
Quote #1
"The document does not comply with the FRAP or the Court's Local Rules"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000904.jpg
Quote #2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document