Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse

Location
Mentions
137
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
68
Also known as:
U.S. Courthouse

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

007.pdf

This document is a 'Notice of Initial Pretrial Conference' issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on August 28, 2019, in the civil case of VE v. Nine East 71st Street Corporation, Financial Trust Company, Inc., and NES, LLC. The order schedules a mandatory pretrial conference for December 6, 2019, at the Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse in New York. It instructs counsel to confer regarding settlement and discovery, and to submit a joint letter and Proposed Civil Case Management Plan seven days prior to the conference.

Legal order (notice of initial pretrial conference)
2025-12-26

22-1426_Documents.pdf

This document consists of a Docketing Notice from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals dated July 8, 2022, for the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426), and a Notice of Appeal and Criminal Docket from the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed July 7, 2022. It details Maxwell's conviction and sentencing, including multi-year imprisonment terms and a $750,000 fine for charges related to conspiracy to entice minors for illegal sex acts, transport minors for sexual activity, and sex trafficking, with some counts dismissed or deemed multiplicitous.

Court document (notice of appeal, criminal docket)
2025-12-26

20-3061_Documents.pdf

This document is the complete appellate record for case 20-3061, an interlocutory appeal by Ghislaine Maxwell against the United States. Maxwell appealed a District Court order denying her motion to modify a protective order, seeking permission to share confidential criminal discovery materials under seal with the judge in a related civil case (Giuffre v. Maxwell) to challenge the government's acquisition of evidence. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, ruling that the protective order decision was not a final judgment or an appealable collateral order, and denied Maxwell's motion to consolidate the criminal appeal with the civil appeal.

Court record / appellate case file
2025-12-26

19-2221_Documents.pdf

This document contains a docketing notice from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding Jeffrey Epstein's appeal (19-2221) from a District Court decision (1:19-cr-490-1), dated July 23, 2019. It also includes the Notice of Appeal filed on July 22, 2019, detailing Epstein's legal representation and the pending charges of sex trafficking conspiracy and sex trafficking of children. The document lists multiple attorneys representing Jeffrey Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office representing the USA.

Court document (docketing notice and notice of appeal)
2025-12-26

005.pdf

This document is an initial pretrial conference order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of Jane Doe 1000 v. Darren K. Indyke, et al., filed on November 18, 2019. Judge Lorna G. Schofield orders counsel to appear for a conference on January 9, 2020, and mandates the submission of a joint letter detailing the case status, discovery plans, and settlement discussions prior to the meeting. The order also provides instructions for ECF registration and notifying all parties involved.

Court order (initial pretrial conference order)
2025-12-26

EFTA00031173.pdf

This document is an email chain and press guidance from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) dated November 26, 2021, regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. It details a specific interaction between journalist Dipesh Gadher of The Sunday Times and the SDNY press office concerning the identification of a victim/witness who had previously waived anonymity; the SDNY instructs that the court order requires the use of pseudonyms regardless of prior waivers. The document also includes general press guidance regarding trial logistics, the use of pseudonyms for sensitive witnesses, and access to government exhibits.

Email chain / press guidance
2025-12-25

EFTA00029584.pdf

This document is a letter from attorney Scott A. Srebnick to Judge Paul G. Gardephe regarding the prison conditions of Michael Avenatti at MCC-New York. The letter details Avenatti's placement in the Special Housing Unit (SHU) on the 10-South floor (formerly El Chapo's cell), citing extreme cold, isolation, and lack of resources as impediments to trial preparation. The defense requests Avenatti be moved to the general population and granted standard access to legal materials and communication. The text alludes to 'recent issues at the institution,' likely a reference to Jeffrey Epstein's suicide at the same facility months prior.

Legal letter/filing (united states district court southern district of new york)
2025-12-25

EFTA00029582.pdf

An email from the SDNY Attorney's Office providing press guidance for the U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell trial dated November 23, 2021. The document outlines privacy measures for victim witnesses testifying under pseudonyms, details the schedule for the final pretrial conference before Judge Alison Nathan, and provides instructions for media access to exhibits and credentialing.

Email / press guidance
2025-12-25

EFTA00028165.pdf

This document is a Court Order from the Southern District of New York dated November 3, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan schedules a hearing for November 10, 2021, to address motions regarding Federal Rules of Evidence 412 and 702 (Daubert). The order also sets briefing deadlines for issues concerning anticipated witness testimony and instructions for docketing redacted exhibits.

Court order
2025-12-25

EFTA00024892.pdf

This document is an email and attached press guidance from the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the trial of U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell in November 2021. It outlines the specific charges against Maxwell (Counts 1-6) and their maximum prison sentences, while also providing off-the-record guidance that certain witnesses will testify under pseudonyms to protect victim identities. The document includes logistical details for the press, such as the final pretrial conference schedule with Judge Alison Nathan and instructions for accessing government exhibits via the SDNY file share.

Email / press guidance
2025-12-25

EFTA00014506.pdf

A formal notice from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dated July 18, 2017, announcing a change in the assigned case manager for docket 16-3945cv ([Redacted] v. Maxwell). The document lists Robert A. Katzmann as Chief Judge and references the underlying District Court case (15-cv-7433) presided over by Judge Sweet.

Court notice
2025-12-25

EFTA00009502.pdf

Transcript of Grand Jury proceedings from April 24, 2007, regarding 'Operation Leap Year'. An FBI Special Agent testifies to establish background for a female witness/victim who was a minor when she met Epstein. The testimony reveals that during a 2005 interview, Palm Beach Police threatened to charge this victim for recruiting other girls for Epstein, causing her to retain counsel. The court subsequently issued an immunity order to compel her testimony.

Grand jury testimony transcript
2025-12-25

DOJ-OGR-00001404.jpg

This is a legal notice from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated April 27, 2021, regarding the case of United States of America v. Maxwell (Case 21-770). The document formally announces that the case manager assigned to the matter has been changed. It provides a phone number for any inquiries related to the case.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001367.jpg

This is a Motion Information Statement filed on April 15, 2021, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Attorney Christian R. Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP is requesting to withdraw as counsel of record for Ghislaine Maxwell because she has retained new counsel, David Oscar Markus of Markus/Moss PLLC, for her appeal. The motion is unopposed by the United States, represented by AUSA Maurene Comey.

Legal motion (motion information statement)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001310.jpg

This document is a 'Notice of Defective Filing' issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on April 5, 2021, regarding the case United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket 21-58). The notice indicates that a 'Notice of Appearance as Additional Counsel' submitted by the United States (Appellee) did not comply with Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (FRAP) or Local Rules, though the specific reason is not checked in the visible list. The document lists Judge Debra Ann Livingston and Clerk Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe as court officials.

Court notice (notice of defective filing)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000906.jpg

This document is a 'Notice of Defective Filing' issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on April 1, 2021. It addresses a 'Notice of Appearance as Additional Counsel' submitted on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell, which failed to comply with court rules, specifically being 'Not Text-Searchable'. The notice lists various reasons for non-compliance with FRAP and Local Rules.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000904.jpg

This is a Notice of Defective Filing from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding United States of America v. Maxwell (Case 21-770). Dated April 1, 2021, it notifies the defense that a 'Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel' submitted on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell on March 30, 2021, did not comply with Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (FRAP) or Local Rules. The document lists various potential reasons for the defect, though no specific reason is visually checked on this page.

Legal notice (notice of defective filing)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000838.jpg

This is a Docketing Notice from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the case United States of America v. Maxwell (Case 21-770), dated March 29, 2021. It notifies counsel that the appeal has been docketed and provides instructions regarding the Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form, which must be returned within 14 days. The document references the lower court case (1:20-cr-330-1) presided over by Judge Nathan in the SDNY.

Legal document (docketing notice)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000835.jpg

This document is a formal Notice of Case Manager Change from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the case United States of America v. Epstein, dated August 21, 2019. It lists Judge Berman as the District Court Judge and provides a phone number for inquiries.

Court notice
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000830.jpg

This is a "Notice of Defective Filing" issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on August 5, 2019, in the case of United States of America v. Epstein. The notice states that a filing for additional counsel, submitted on behalf of the appellant, was rejected because the document was not text-searchable, which violates Local Rules 25.1 and 25.2. The document identifies the case docket numbers and the presiding judges for both the appellate and district courts.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00020691.jpg

This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from November 13 to November 15, 2021. It details procedural orders regarding jury questionnaires and voir dire logistics (including COVID protocols), the filing of transcripts for previous conferences, and a sealed document. It also lists correspondence from both the prosecution (regarding exhibits) and the defense (regarding late disclosures to the MDC).

Court docket sheet / pacer report
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00020690.jpg

This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 12, 2021. It details orders regarding strict COVID-19 protocols for an upcoming in-person proceeding on November 15, 2021, including the use of overflow courtrooms for the public. Additionally, it includes an order addressing a Government motion, where the Judge rules that limiting cross-examination of pseudonymous witnesses regarding their careers would violate Maxwell's Sixth Amendment rights, though specific employer names cannot be elicited.

Court docket sheet / pacer report
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00020687.jpg

This document is a court docket entry from February 28, 2023, for Case 22-1426, primarily concerning Ghislaine Maxwell. It details court orders and filings from November 2021, including COVID-19 protocols for courthouse access, scheduling revisions for motions in limine, and a pretrial conference. The entries highlight communications between the prosecution (USA) and defense (Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys) regarding trial logistics and a ruling on witness testimony, all overseen by Judge Alison J. Nathan.

Court docket
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00020682.jpg

This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering proceedings from November 1-3, 2021. It details a pretrial conference where Maxwell was present and remanded, as well as various filings including motions for reconsideration regarding bond and juror disclosure. The Judge also issued orders regarding voir dire instructions and scheduled a hearing for November 10, 2021, to discuss evidentiary rules (Rule 412 and 702/Daubert).

Court docket / pacer report (sdny cm/ecf)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00020679.jpg

This document is a court docket from Case 22-1426, detailing a series of legal filings and court orders from October 27 to October 29, 2021, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries include an order by Judge Alison J. Nathan scheduling a pretrial conference for November 1, 2021, and numerous motions in limine filed by both the defense and prosecution to exclude specific evidence ahead of the trial. The document outlines the procedural steps and legal arguments being made by both sides in preparation for the trial.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity