DOJ-OGR-00005399.jpg
677 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
0
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / court order / memorandum of law
File Size:
677 KB
Summary
This document is page 6 of a legal filing from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 29, 2021. It discusses legal standards and Second Circuit precedents regarding the protection of witness identities versus a defendant's right to cross-examination. The text cites various cases (Marcus, Marti, Urena, Cavallaro) to support the argument that courts must balance witness safety against the defense's need for information, particularly in cases involving sex trafficking or safety risks.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Marcus | Case Citation Subject |
Referenced in case law 'United States v. Marcus' regarding witness anonymity.
|
| Marti | Case Citation Subject |
Referenced in case law 'United States v. Marti' regarding witness identification.
|
| Bennett | Case Citation Subject |
Referenced in case law 'United States v. Bennett'.
|
| Urena | Case Citation Subject |
Referenced in case law 'United States v. Urena' regarding undercover officers testifying under pseudonyms.
|
| Cavallaro | Case Citation Subject |
Referenced in case law 'United States v. Cavallaro' regarding witness safety balancing.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Second Circuit Court of Appeals |
Cited as establishing the primary interests of defendants regarding witness disclosure.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (indicated in footer stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
|
| E.D.N.Y. |
Eastern District of New York (cited in case law).
|
|
| S.D.N.Y. |
Southern District of New York (cited in case law).
|
Key Quotes (3)
"In the context of the disclosure of witness identifying information, the Second Circuit has identified two primary interests of defendants: '(1) obtaining information needed for in-court and out-of-court investigation of the witness; and (2) enabling defense counsel to elicit information that might be relevant to the jury’s deliberations as to the credibility or knowledgeability of the witness.'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00005399.jpg
Quote #1
"If the Government provides a reason to 'limit disclosure of identifying information in open court,' the defendant must 'demonstrate a ‘particularized need’ for disclosure . . . which the court weighs against the risks to the witness.'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00005399.jpg
Quote #2
"[W]here the government voices a legitimate concern for a witness’ safety, the trial court must balance the potential danger to the witness against the need of the defense for the information."Source
DOJ-OGR-00005399.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document