DOJ-OGR-00020658.jpg

1.21 MB
View Original

Extraction Summary

8
People
5
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court docket / case log (sdny cm/ecf)
File Size: 1.21 MB
Summary

This document is a court docket log (SDNY CM/ECF) from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between April 22 and April 23, 2021. It details procedural exchanges regarding electronic devices in the courtroom (denied), suppression motions, adjournment requests, and proposed redactions to protect third-party privacy (granted). The document lists key legal teams for both the defense (Boies Schiller Flexner) and the prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz, Rohrbach), and includes Judge Alison J. Nathan's rulings on these procedural matters.

People (8)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Subject of the court proceedings and letters filed.
Alison J. Nathan Judge
Presiding judge issuing endorsements and receiving letters.
Sigrid McCawley Attorney
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP; filed request regarding electronic devices.
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Attorney
Counsel for Maxwell; filed response regarding suppression motions.
Maurene Comey AUSA (Prosecutor)
Filed letters for USA regarding adjournment, orders, and redactions.
Alison Moe AUSA (Prosecutor)
Listed on letters filed by USA.
Lara Pomerantz AUSA (Prosecutor)
Listed on letters filed by USA.
Andrew Rohrbach AUSA (Prosecutor)
Listed on letters filed by USA.

Organizations (5)

Name Type Context
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
Law firm representing the defense (associated with Sigrid McCawley).
USA
United States of America (Prosecution/Government).
SDNY
Southern District of New York (Court jurisdiction).
Second Circuit
Court of Appeals mentioned in legal citation.
DOJ-OGR
Department of Justice - Office of Government Information Services (indicated by footer stamp).

Timeline (2 events)

04/23/2021
Sealed Document placed in vault.
Court Vault
04/23/2021
Arraignment
Courtroom (implied by text 'tomorrow's arraignment')

Locations (2)

Location Context
Court jurisdiction.
Mentioned in case citation (Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga).

Relationships (3)

Ghislaine Maxwell Attorney-Client Sigrid McCawley
LETTER by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP as to Ghislaine Maxwell... from Sigrid McCawley
Ghislaine Maxwell Attorney-Client Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell... from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
Maurene Comey Prosecutor (AUSA) USA
LETTER by USA... from AUSAs Maurene Comey

Key Quotes (4)

"Because remote access is available for tomorrow and because no electronic devices may be used in the courtroom or overflow rooms... that request is denied."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020658.jpg
Quote #1
"The Court grants the Government's redaction requests."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020658.jpg
Quote #2
"The Court concludes that these are judicial documents and that the First Amendment and common law presumptions of access attach."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020658.jpg
Quote #3
"the need to protect the privacy interests of third parties referenced in the documents, favor the narrowly tailored redactions."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020658.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document