DOJ-OGR-00002834.jpg

746 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

2
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal court filing / judicial order or opinion
File Size: 746 KB
Summary

This page is from a legal filing (Document 189) in the case of United States v. Schulte (Case 1:17-cr-00548-PAC), filed on March 24, 2021. The text discusses a legal dispute regarding jury selection venues, specifically distinguishing the current case from *United States v. Johnson*. The court argues that unlike in *Johnson*, Schulte's grand and petit juries were drawn from different courthouses, invalidating his argument regarding the 'relevant community' for the jury pool. The document mentions the 'underrepresentation analysis' and the 'absolute disparity method' for assessing jury fairness. While comprised in a dataset potentially related to Epstein, the text explicitly concerns Joshua Schulte (likely the CIA Vault 7 case).

People (2)

Name Role Context
Schulte Defendant
The defendant in the current case (United States v. Schulte), arguing against the jury selection process/venue.
Johnson Defendant (Cited Case)
Referenced in case law (United States v. Johnson) used by Schulte to support his argument.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
The Government
Accused by Schulte of 'prosecutorial gamesmanship' and forum shopping.
Second Circuit
Mentioned in footnote 7 as having binding authority (referencing Bahna).
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York, mentioned in the citation for U.S. v. Johnson.

Timeline (1 events)

2021-03-24
Filing of Document 189 in Case 1:17-cr-00548-PAC.
Court (S.D.N.Y.)

Locations (2)

Location Context
Courthouse location discussed regarding where indictments were sought and where juries were drawn.
Refers to the judicial district (likely S.D.N.Y.) as a whole.

Relationships (1)

Schulte Adversarial The Government
Legal arguments regarding indictment and jury selection methods.

Key Quotes (4)

"the Government had engaged in 'prosecutorial gamesmanship' and forum shopping by seeking the Indictment from White Plains."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00002834.jpg
Quote #1
"Schulte's grand and petit juries derive from different courthouses in the District."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00002834.jpg
Quote #2
"Schulte's reliance on Johnson is misplaced."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00002834.jpg
Quote #3
"The 'primary approach used in this Circuit' is the absolute disparity method."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00002834.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document