087.pdf
151 KB
Extraction Summary
7
People
5
Organizations
5
Locations
4
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal motion (motion for extension of time)
File Size:
151 KB
Summary
This document is a Motion for Extension of Time filed on December 2, 2009, by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team in the case of Jane Doe No. 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein. The defense requested an extension until December 15, 2009, to file a reply, citing ongoing settlement negotiations and the need to investigate the implications of the 'Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler, PA' firm implosion on the Plaintiff's counsel. The document notes that Plaintiff's counsel opposed this extension request.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant |
Seeking extension of time to file reply; negotiating resolution.
|
| Jane Doe No. 101 | Plaintiff |
Opposing party in the lawsuit.
|
| Robert D. Critton Jr. | Attorney |
Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein; signed the motion.
|
| Michael J. Pike | Attorney |
Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein.
|
| Jack Alan Goldberger | Attorney |
Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein.
|
| Robert C. Josefsberg | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiff.
|
| Katherine W. Ezell | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiff.
|
Timeline (4 events)
2009-05-01
2009-05-26
Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint [DE 29].
Southern District of Florida
2009-06-26
Plaintiff filed her Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint [DE 56].
Southern District of Florida
2009-12-02
Filing of Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time.
Southern District of Florida
Relationships (2)
Plaintiff v. Defendant in Case No. 09-80591
Listed as Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
Key Quotes (3)
"The parties continue to work together to find a resolution in this case and are close to a resolution."Source
087.pdf
Quote #1
"The implosion of the Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler, PA firm has raised certain questions for which defense counsel will request answers/information from Plaintiff's counsel regarding the Rothstein scheme/scandal prior to final resolution."Source
087.pdf
Quote #2
"Plaintiff's counsel is not in agreement with the requested extension at this time."Source
087.pdf
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document