HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017622.jpg
2.36 MB
Extraction Summary
4
People
5
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal journal article / congressional document production
File Size:
2.36 MB
Summary
This document is page 19 of a legal text (likely a law review article or legal memorandum by David Schoen) produced to the House Oversight Committee. It critiques an Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) memo, arguing that the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) should apply before criminal charges are filed to prevent 'secondary victimization.' The text specifically cites the 'Epstein case' (Does v. United States, S.D. Fla. 2011) as a legal precedent where the court ruled that the CVRA contemplates pre-charge application.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Epstein | Defendant |
Mentioned in the context of 'the Epstein case' where the district court concluded that the CVRA contemplates pre-char...
|
| David Schoen | Attorney/Author |
Name appears at the footer of the document, suggesting he is the author or the source of this submission to House Ove...
|
| Sen. Jon Kyl | Senator |
Cited in footnote 155 and 160 regarding legislative statements on the CVRA.
|
| Susan Estrich | Author |
Cited in footnote 157 for her book 'Real Rape' regarding secondary victimization.
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| OLC |
Office of Legal Counsel. The document critiques the OLC's memorandum regarding the application of the CVRA.
|
|
| Justice Department |
Mentioned as the location of federal prosecutors.
|
|
| Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) |
Mentioned as an example of an agency with investigators subject to CVRA rules.
|
|
| Congress |
Mentioned as the legislative body that intended for broad victim rights.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017622'.
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Southern District of Florida. Cited in footnote 161 regarding the Epstein case (Does v. United States).
|
Relationships (1)
Citation of 'Does v. United States' (the Epstein case) in footnote 161.
Key Quotes (4)
"As the district court concluded in the Epstein case, this provision "surely contemplates pre-charge application of the CVRA.""Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017622.jpg
Quote #1
"OLC's failure to consider the purposes underlying the CVRA is a glaring oversight."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017622.jpg
Quote #2
"Clearly, many victims can and do suffer secondary victimization during criminal investigations..."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017622.jpg
Quote #3
"Congress wanted broad rights extending beyond just the prosecution of a case."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017622.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document