HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021945.jpg

1.35 MB
View Original

Extraction Summary

5
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal transcript / deposition (rough draft)
File Size: 1.35 MB
Summary

This document is page 122 of a rough draft transcript from a legal deposition, likely related to a House Oversight investigation. Attorney Mr. Simpson questions a witness (a former prosecutor from the Eastern District of Virginia) about the admissibility of a third party's Fifth Amendment invocation as evidence in criminal versus civil cases. Mr. Scarola is also present as counsel. The witness discusses their experience with approximately 20 trials involving drug dealers and gun runners but cannot recall specific instances of using the Fifth Amendment in the manner described.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Mr. Simpson Attorney / Questioner
Conducting the examination of the witness regarding legal procedures and Fifth Amendment invocations.
Mr. Scarola Attorney
Interjects to clarify if the question refers to a criminal case.
The Witness Deponent / Former Prosecutor
Answering questions about their past experience as a prosecutor in the Eastern District of Virginia.
Person A Hypothetical Individual
Used in a hypothetical legal scenario regarding pleading the Fifth.
Person B Hypothetical Individual
Used in a hypothetical legal scenario regarding evidence admissibility.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Eastern District of Virginia
Jurisdiction where the witness served as a prosecutor in the general crimes unit.
House Oversight Committee
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
11th Circuit Court
Mentioned in the final question regarding a specific case reference.

Timeline (1 events)

Unknown
Deposition/Hearing Testimony
Unknown

Locations (1)

Location Context
Location of the witness's previous employment.

Relationships (2)

Mr. Simpson Professional/Adversarial The Witness
Simpson is questioning the witness in a legal setting.
Mr. Scarola Opposing Counsel Mr. Simpson
Scarola interjects to clarify Simpson's question.

Key Quotes (3)

"The standards for using it in a civil case would be much, much broader."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021945.jpg
Quote #1
"I haven't been involved in many civil cases involving invocations of the Fifth Amendment so I can't recall a circumstance like that right now."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021945.jpg
Quote #2
"So I had about 20 trials, most of them I was in the general crimes units in the eastern district of Virginia."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021945.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document