DOJ-OGR-00019679.jpg
1.03 MB
Extraction Summary
2
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court order / appellate decision (page 3 of 4)
File Size:
1.03 MB
Summary
This document is page 3 of a court order dated October 19, 2020, denying Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal regarding a protective order. The court rules it lacks jurisdiction to review the interlocutory order, denies her request for a writ of mandamus finding no abuse of discretion by the District Court, and denies her motion to consolidate her criminal appeal with the civil case *Guiffre v. Maxwell*.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Maxwell | Appellant/Defendant |
Ghislaine Maxwell is appealing a lower court order regarding a protective order, requesting a writ of mandamus, and s...
|
| Guiffre | Plaintiff (Civil Case) |
Mentioned in the case citation 'Guiffre v. Maxwell, No. 20-2413-cv' regarding the civil appeal Maxwell wished to cons...
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit |
Implied by case citations ending in '2d Cir.' and the context of appellate review.
|
|
| Supreme Court |
Referenced for legal precedents regarding exceptions in criminal cases.
|
|
| District Court |
The lower court whose orders Maxwell is appealing.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (referenced in footer stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
Timeline (3 events)
Relationships (2)
Maxwell is appealing the District Court's denial of her motion to modify a protective order.
Key Quotes (4)
"Maxwell does not appeal from an order falling within one of these categories. Instead, she appeals from a denial of her motion to modify a protective order, which we have held does not fall within the collateral order exception."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019679.jpg
Quote #1
"We decline to exercise jurisdiction where we have none, and accordingly dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019679.jpg
Quote #2
"Maxwell failed to demonstrate that such exceptional circumstances exist and that the District Court usurped its power or abused its discretion. Accordingly, we decline to issue a writ modifying the protective order."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019679.jpg
Quote #3
"Here, the parties, Judges, and legal issues presented in these appeals lack common identity."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019679.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document