DOJ-OGR-00019375.jpg
693 KB
Extraction Summary
12
People
6
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
3
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal brief / court filing (page 9 of 23)
File Size:
693 KB
Summary
This document is page 9 of a legal brief filed on September 16, 2020, in Case 20-3061 (United States v. Maxwell). The text outlines legal arguments regarding the 'collateral-order doctrine' and 'interlocutory appeals' in criminal cases. It cites numerous precedents (Cohen, Stack, Abney, Sell) to demonstrate that the Supreme Court rarely permits appeals before a trial concludes, arguing that an order is only immediately reviewable if rights would be 'effectively unreviewable' later.
People (12)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Robinson | Legal Case Reference |
Cited in States v. Robinson
|
| Cohen | Legal Case Reference |
Reference to Cohen doctrine regarding collateral orders
|
| Stack | Legal Case Reference |
Cited in Stack v. Boyle regarding bond denial
|
| Boyle | Legal Case Reference |
Cited in Stack v. Boyle
|
| Abney | Legal Case Reference |
Cited in Abney v. United States regarding Double Jeopardy
|
| Helstoski | Legal Case Reference |
Cited in Helstoski v. Meanor regarding Speech or Debate Clause
|
| Meanor | Legal Case Reference |
Cited in Helstoski v. Meanor
|
| Sell | Legal Case Reference |
Cited in Sell v. United States regarding forced administration of drugs
|
| Van Cauwenberghe | Legal Case Reference |
Referenced regarding legal criteria for reviewability
|
| Punn | Legal Case Reference |
Cited in United States v. Punn
|
| Chasser | Legal Case Reference |
Cited in Lauro Lines s.r.l. v. Chasser
|
| Carpenter | Legal Case Reference |
Cited in Mohawk Indus., Inc. v. Carpenter
|
Organizations (6)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| 2d Cir. |
Second Circuit Court of Appeals (mentioned in citations)
|
|
| Supreme Court |
Mentioned as identifying types of pretrial orders
|
|
| Midland Asphalt |
Company cited in legal precedent
|
|
| Lauro Lines s.r.l. |
Company cited in legal precedent
|
|
| Mohawk Indus., Inc. |
Company cited in legal precedent
|
|
| DOJ-OGR |
Department of Justice - Office of Government Relations (implied by footer stamp)
|
Key Quotes (2)
"In over 70 years since Cohen was decided... the Supreme Court has identified only four types of pretrial orders in criminal cases as satisfying the collateral-order doctrine"Source
DOJ-OGR-00019375.jpg
Quote #1
"The justification for immediate appeal must . . . be sufficiently strong to overcome the usual benefits of deferring appeal until litigation concludes."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019375.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document