HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017742.jpg
2.41 MB
Extraction Summary
4
People
5
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document / law review article printout
File Size:
2.41 MB
Summary
This document appears to be a page from a 2005 BYU Law Review article (page 28 of a 52-page production) included in a file by attorney David Schoen for the House Oversight Committee. The text outlines legal arguments regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), quoting Senator Kyl and citing case law (State v. Timmendequas) to argue that victims have a due process right to be heard, particularly regarding venue transfer decisions, to minimize their inconvenience and trauma.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| David Schoen | Attorney |
Name appears in the footer, indicating this document was part of his file or submission.
|
| Senator Kyl | Senator |
Quoted regarding the intent of victims' rights legislation and the CVRA.
|
| Timmendequas | Defendant |
Defendant in a cited New Jersey capital case (State v. Timmendequas).
|
| Fletcher | Legal Scholar/Author |
Cited in footnote 211 regarding venue changes.
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| House Oversight Committee |
Document bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT.
|
|
| Congress |
Mentioned as the legislative body intended to afford crime victims due process.
|
|
| New Jersey Supreme Court |
Court that decided State v. Timmendequas.
|
|
| New Jersey Legislature |
Enacted the Crime Victim's Bill of Rights.
|
|
| BYU Law Review |
Source of the text (2005 B.Y.U.L. Rev. 835).
|
Timeline (2 events)
1999
April 22, 2004
Statement by Senator Kyl in the Congressional Record regarding victims' rights.
US Congress
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction of the cited case State v. Timmendequas.
|
Relationships (1)
David Schoen's name appears on a document stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT.
Key Quotes (4)
"Too often victims of crime experience a secondary victimization at the hands of the criminal justice system."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017742.jpg
Quote #1
"Clearly, Congress intended to afford crime victims a broad right to due process in criminal proceedings."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017742.jpg
Quote #2
"Concluding that victims have a right to be heard on transfer decision does not mean, of course, that they will dictate the transfer decision."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017742.jpg
Quote #3
"One of the enumerated rights guaranteed for victims is 'to have inconveniences associated with participation in the criminal justice process minimized to the fullest extent possible.'"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017742.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document