An ambiguous note from the jury was sent to the Court. The Defendant argued it revealed an improper conviction, but the Court disagreed with this interpretation.
This legal document is a court opinion denying a defendant's post-trial motions. The court rejects the defendant's argument that a witness's (Jane's) testimony caused "ultimate prejudice" leading to improper convictions on Mann Act counts. The court also denies the defendant's claim of prejudicial pre-indictment delay, stating that the defendant failed to meet the stringent two-part legal test required to prove such a claim.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication