📧 Communication

conversation

Communication Details

To
The other brother The other brother
Subject
Potential conversation
Message Content

Prosecution claims there is no suggestion they conversed about anything of substance; Defense claims they don't know if she has spoken to him.

📄 Source Document

DOJ-OGR-00013281.jpg
DOJ Collection
View Document
Document Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger and Prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach argue over the relevance of a potential witness identified as 'the other brother' and his potential communications with a witness named 'Jane.' The defense notes they have subpoenaed this brother based on his prior FBI interviews, while the prosecution argues there is no basis for further inquiry as 'Jane' has already testified and the government is not calling 'Brian' as a witness.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication