| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Interviewee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 |
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger and Prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach argue over the relevance of a potential witness identified as 'the other brother' and his potential communications with a witness named 'Jane.' The defense notes they have subpoenaed this brother based on his prior FBI interviews, while the prosecution argues there is no basis for further inquiry as 'Jane' has already testified and the government is not calling 'Brian' as a witness.
Prosecution claims there is no suggestion they conversed about anything of substance; Defense claims they don't know if she has spoken to him.
Defense has subpoenaed the brother based on things he told the government during his FBI interviews.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity