DOJ-OGR-00013281.jpg
614 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
614 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger and Prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach argue over the relevance of a potential witness identified as 'the other brother' and his potential communications with a witness named 'Jane.' The defense notes they have subpoenaed this brother based on his prior FBI interviews, while the prosecution argues there is no basis for further inquiry as 'Jane' has already testified and the government is not calling 'Brian' as a witness.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Menninger | Defense Attorney |
Speaking on behalf of the defense regarding subpoenas and witnesses.
|
| Mr. Rohrbach | Prosecutor (Government) |
Arguing against the defense's request for disclosure and further inquiry.
|
| Brian | Potential Witness |
The government is not calling him as a witness at this time.
|
| Jane | Witness |
Has already testified; prosecution argues there is no basis to inquire further about her conversations.
|
| The other brother | Subpoenaed Individual |
Under subpoena by the defense; interviewed by the government/FBI.
|
| Your Honor | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing (addressed by counsel).
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Government |
Prosecution team in the case.
|
|
| FBI |
Conducted interviews with 'the other brother'.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting service.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Court hearing regarding subpoenas and witness testimony in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (US v. Ghislaine Maxwell).
Courtroom (Southern District)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied jurisdiction (SDNY) via the court reporter's name.
|
Relationships (3)
Defense (Menninger) has him under subpoena but is not in contact with him.
He told the government things during his FBI interviews.
Counsel debating whether they have conversed about anything of substance.
Key Quotes (4)
"The government is not calling Brian as a witness at this time"Source
DOJ-OGR-00013281.jpg
Quote #1
"Jane has already testified."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013281.jpg
Quote #2
"We have him under subpoena based on his interviews with the government and the things he told the government during his FBI"Source
DOJ-OGR-00013281.jpg
Quote #3
"I don't see any basis for that, your Honor."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013281.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,555 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 3 of 262 1708
LC8Cmax1
LC8Cmax1
1 that, even though the government is not calling him, you may
2 still seek to subpoena him?
3 MS. MENNINGER: We may, your Honor. As I mentioned,
4 we have the other brother under subpoena and some of this
5 depends on what comes out between now and our case in chief.
6 I'm not 100 percent sure I can give you ballparks of
7 likelihoods, but I think we would need to see -- I would like
8 full disclosure before we make a decision about that.
9 MR. ROHRBACH: I don't see any basis for that, your
10 Honor. The government is not calling Brian as a witness at
11 this time, so there is no basis for us to inquire more about
12 Brian's statements. The other brother is not a government
13 witness and is also not -- there is no suggestion that that
14 brother has been in conversation with Jane about anything of
15 substance in any event. That's a defense witness. Jane has
16 already testified. So there is no basis for us to inquire
17 further about that.
18 If she's subject to recall, she's subject to recall
19 for confrontation about the prior consistent statements that
20 have been introduced and not just general additional questions
21 by the defense.
22 MS. MENNINGER: We don't know if she's spoken to the
23 other brother, your Honor. We are not in contact with him. We
24 have him under subpoena based on his interviews with the
25 government and the things he told the government during his FBI
2 still seek to subpoena him?
3 MS. MENNINGER: We may, your Honor. As I mentioned,
4 we have the other brother under subpoena and some of this
5 depends on what comes out between now and our case in chief.
6 I'm not 100 percent sure I can give you ballparks of
7 likelihoods, but I think we would need to see -- I would like
8 full disclosure before we make a decision about that.
9 MR. ROHRBACH: I don't see any basis for that, your
10 Honor. The government is not calling Brian as a witness at
11 this time, so there is no basis for us to inquire more about
12 Brian's statements. The other brother is not a government
13 witness and is also not -- there is no suggestion that that
14 brother has been in conversation with Jane about anything of
15 substance in any event. That's a defense witness. Jane has
16 already testified. So there is no basis for us to inquire
17 further about that.
18 If she's subject to recall, she's subject to recall
19 for confrontation about the prior consistent statements that
20 have been introduced and not just general additional questions
21 by the defense.
22 MS. MENNINGER: We don't know if she's spoken to the
23 other brother, your Honor. We are not in contact with him. We
24 have him under subpoena based on his interviews with the
25 government and the things he told the government during his FBI
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013281
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document