A dialogue during a court proceeding where Ms. Moe argues for the government that an offense continued past November 1, 2004, based on trial testimony. The Court reframes the key question to whether conspiratorial conduct can be proven to have occurred within the specific window of November and December 2004.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated June 29, 2023, detailing a legal discussion between a judge and attorneys. The government, represented by Ms. Moe, argues that the 2004 Manual is applicable because the offense in question continued past November 1, 2004, citing trial testimony. The judge reframes the issue, focusing the argument on whether there is a preponderance of evidence of conspiratorial conduct within the specific two-month window of November and December 2004.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication