Mr. Cohen cites several high-profile cases to argue for certain conditions. The Court questions the relevance of these cases, specifically asking if the defendants in those cases had substantial international connections. Mr. Cohen concedes they did not.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021. An attorney, Mr. Cohen, is arguing a point by citing past high-profile cases like Madoff, Dreier, and Esposito. The judge interrupts to question the relevance of these precedents, specifically asking if those defendants had substantial international connections, which distinguishes them from the current case. Mr. Cohen admits they did not, highlighting that the current defendant's foreign ties are a key point of contention.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication