This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021. An attorney, Mr. Cohen, is arguing a point by citing past high-profile cases like Madoff, Dreier, and Esposito. The judge interrupts to question the relevance of these precedents, specifically asking if those defendants had substantial international connections, which distinguishes them from the current case. Mr. Cohen admits they did not, highlighting that the current defendant's foreign ties are a key point of contention.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Madoff |
Mentioned as a name in a high-profile case cited as a precedent ('cases like Madoff').
|
|
| Dreier |
Mentioned as a name in a high-profile case cited as a precedent ('cases like Dreier').
|
|
| Esposito |
Mentioned as a name in a case where Judge Marrero ruled in 2018, cited as a precedent.
|
|
| Judge Marrero | Judge |
Mentioned as the judge who ruled in the Esposito case in 2018.
|
| Mr. Cohen | Attorney |
A speaker in the transcript, addressed by the court, arguing on behalf of a defendant.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting agency.
|
| the government | government agency |
Mentioned as a party in the legal proceedings ('the government is just avoiding', 'The government said --').
|
| THE COURT | government agency |
A speaker in the transcript, presiding over the case.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as the location of past high-profile cases.
|
"Mr. Cohen, just before you move to that, the three cases that you cited -- Esposito, Dreier, Madoff -- factually did any of those cases involve defendants with substantial international and foreign connections?"Source
"No, I don't believe they did."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,595 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document