📧 Communication

comment

Communication Details

To
The Board (NLRB) The Board (NLRB)
Subject
Misleading language on collective-bargaining obligations
Message Content

Argued that the notice fails to clarify that an employer is not obligated to consent to a collective-bargaining agreement, but only to bargain in good faith. Suggested the notice should state that the NLRA does not compel agreement or concessions.

📄 Source Document

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022292.jpg
ESTATE Collection
View Document
Document Summary

This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing the National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) response to public comments on a proposed employee rights notice. The Board addresses and refutes or incorporates feedback from organizations like COLLE, ALFA, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce regarding the language on collective bargaining, the right to strike, and the right to refrain from union activity. The document has no connection to Jeffrey Epstein and is strictly related to U.S. labor law and regulatory procedure.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication