📧 Communication

letter

Communication Details

From
To
Honorable Alison J. Nathan Honorable Alison J. Nathan
Date
June 25, 2022
Subject
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Message Content

A letter opposing the motion filed by counsel for Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein to give oral victim impact statements at Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing hearing. The letter argues that neither individual qualifies as a statutory crime victim under the CVRA.

📄 Source Document

DOJ-OGR-00010725.jpg
DOJ Collection
View Document
Document Summary

This legal letter, dated June 25, 2022, is from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim opposes a motion filed on behalf of Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein, who seek to provide oral victim impact statements at Maxwell's sentencing. The letter argues that the motion should be denied because neither Ransome nor Stein qualify as statutory crime victims under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA).

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication