DOJ-OGR-00010725.jpg
431 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
3
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
431 KB
Summary
This legal letter, dated June 25, 2022, is from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim opposes a motion filed on behalf of Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein, who seek to provide oral victim impact statements at Maxwell's sentencing. The letter argues that the motion should be denied because neither Ransome nor Stein qualify as statutory crime victims under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA).
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| BOBBI C. STERNHEIM | Attorney |
Author of the letter, representing the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
|
| Alison J. Nathan | Honorable Judge, Sitting By Designation |
Recipient of the letter, presiding over the case at the United States District Court.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
The defendant in the case 'United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell', whose sentencing hearing is mentioned.
|
| Sarah Ransome | Potential Victim |
An individual who, through counsel, filed a motion to give an oral victim impact statement at Ms. Maxwell's sentencing.
|
| Elizabeth Stein | Potential Victim |
An individual who, through counsel, filed a motion to give an oral victim impact statement at Ms. Maxwell's sentencing.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM | Law Firm |
The law firm represented by the author of the letter, Bobbi C. Sternheim.
|
| United States District Court | Court |
The court where Judge Alison J. Nathan presides and where the case is being heard.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Ms. Maxwell's sentencing hearing, during which Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein have requested to give oral victim impact statements.
United States District Court
A motion and exhibits were filed by counsel for Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein requesting permission to give oral victim impact statements.
Locations (3)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The address of the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
|
|
|
The address of the United States District Court.
|
|
|
The city where both the law office and the court are located.
|
Relationships (3)
Bobbi C. Sternheim is writing to the judge in Ghislaine Maxwell's case (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) to oppose a motion, indicating she is acting as Maxwell's legal counsel.
Sarah Ransome is seeking to give a victim impact statement at Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing, positioning herself as a victim of Maxwell's crimes.
Elizabeth Stein is seeking to give a victim impact statement at Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing, positioning herself as a victim of Maxwell's crimes.
Key Quotes (1)
"Neither Ms. Ransome nor Ms. Stein qualify as statutory crime victims under the CVRA."Source
— BOBBI C. STERNHEIM
(The central legal argument presented in the letter to oppose the motion for Ransome and Stein to give victim impact statements.)
DOJ-OGR-00010725.jpg
Quote #1
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (980 characters)
LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM
212-243-1100 • Main
917-912-9698 • Cell
888-587-4737 • Fax
917-912-9698 • Cell
888-587-4737 • Fax
225 Broadway, Suite 715
New York, NY 10007
bcsternheim@mac.com
New York, NY 10007
bcsternheim@mac.com
June 25, 2022
Honorable Alison J. Nathan
Sitting By Designation
United States District Court
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10010
Sitting By Designation
United States District Court
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10010
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell
S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Dear Judge Nathan:
This letter is submitted in response to the motion and exhibits filed by counsel for Sarah
Ransome and Elizabeth Stein, requesting permission for both individuals to give oral victim impact
statements during Ms. Maxwell’s sentencing hearing. See Dkt. 675, 675-1, 675-2. We oppose the motion
for the reasons stated in our previous submissions on this issue and incorporated herein (Dkt. 667, 672):
Neither Ms. Ransome nor Ms. Stein qualify as statutory crime victims under the CVRA. The motion
should be denied in its entirety.
Ransome and Elizabeth Stein, requesting permission for both individuals to give oral victim impact
statements during Ms. Maxwell’s sentencing hearing. See Dkt. 675, 675-1, 675-2. We oppose the motion
for the reasons stated in our previous submissions on this issue and incorporated herein (Dkt. 667, 672):
Neither Ms. Ransome nor Ms. Stein qualify as statutory crime victims under the CVRA. The motion
should be denied in its entirety.
Very truly yours,
/s/
BOBBI C. STERNHEIM
cc: Counsel of Record
DOJ-OGR-00010725
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document