DOJ-OGR-00019605.jpg
424 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
424 KB
Summary
This document, dated September 28, 2020, is a legal argument asserting that a writ of mandamus is necessary to address inconsistent decisions by judges in the Southern District of New York concerning Ms. Maxwell's motion to consolidate. It concludes by recommending that the Court deny the government's motion to dismiss the appeal, emphasizing that deposition material will become moot once unsealed.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell |
Her motion to consolidate is mentioned, and judges' decisions are said to be to her prejudice.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Court | judicial body |
Refers to the judicial body making decisions and considering motions.
|
| Southern District of New York | judicial district |
Where judges have reached inconsistent decisions.
|
| government | government agency |
Party whose motion to dismiss the appeal is being discussed.
|
Timeline (3 events)
Unsealing order pending appeal
Ms. Maxwell’s motion to consolidate
Government’s motion to dismiss the appeal
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Part of the 'Southern District of New York'.
|
Relationships (2)
The judges in the Southern District of New York have reached inconsistent decisions to prejudice of Ms. Maxwell.
The government has a motion to dismiss the appeal before this Court.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (830 characters)
Case 20-3061, Document 69, 09/28/2020, 2940206, Page14 of 15
with the benefit of knowing what everyone else knows will become moot once the
deposition material is unsealed (as this Court already recognized by staying the
unsealing order pending appeal).
deposition material is unsealed (as this Court already recognized by staying the
unsealing order pending appeal).
Finally, it is appropriate for this Court to issue a writ of mandamus because,
as explained in Ms. Maxwell’s motion to consolidate, the judges in the Southern
District of New York have reached inconsistent decisions to prejudice of Ms.
Maxwell. A writ of mandamus is appropriate because only this Court can guarantee
that all the judges below are on the same page.
as explained in Ms. Maxwell’s motion to consolidate, the judges in the Southern
District of New York have reached inconsistent decisions to prejudice of Ms.
Maxwell. A writ of mandamus is appropriate because only this Court can guarantee
that all the judges below are on the same page.
Conclusion
For these reasons, as well as those given in the opening brief, Doc. 60, pp 10–
22, this Court should deny the government’s motion to dismiss the appeal.
22, this Court should deny the government’s motion to dismiss the appeal.
September 28, 2020.
13
DOJ-OGR-00019605
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document