DOJ-OGR-00001053.jpg
649 KB
Extraction Summary
8
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
7
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
649 KB
Summary
This document is an excerpt from a legal transcript dated April 1, 2021, where an attorney argues about bail conditions for a defendant. The attorney references several legal precedents (Khashoggi, Bodmer, Hanson, Sabhnani) to assert that international ties and financial means should lead to stricter bail conditions, not a denial of bail. The current defendant is described as a citizen of England and France with three passports, who has traveled internationally and has financial means, and the attorney cites the Sabhnani case, which involved allegations of holding individuals in slavery, to support their argument regarding bail.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Khashoggi | Defendant |
Mentioned in the legal case 'U.S. v. Khashoggi'
|
| Bodmer | Defendant |
Mentioned in the legal case 'U.S. v. Bodmer'
|
| Hanson | Defendant |
Mentioned in the legal case 'U.S. v. Hanson'
|
| Sabhnani | Defendant |
Mentioned in the 'Sabhnani' case, a Second Circuit case involving allegations of holding individuals in slavery
|
| your Honor | Judge |
Addressed by the speaker, who is responding to 'your Honor's question'
|
| Judge | Judge |
Addressed by the speaker: 'I will get to that in a moment, Judge.'
|
| defendant | Defendant |
The subject of the current discussion, described as a citizen of England and France with three passports, who has tra...
|
| I | Speaker/Attorney |
The person speaking in the transcript, addressing the Judge and presenting the case.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| U.S. | Government agency |
Party in legal cases 'U.S. v. Khashoggi', 'U.S. v. Bodmer', 'U.S. v. Hanson'. Also referred to as 'the government' in...
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Entity responsible for transcribing the document, listed at the bottom.
|
Timeline (7 events)
Allegation that defendants in the Sabhnani case held two individuals in slavery for five years.
Sabhnani defendants
two individuals
Relationships (3)
The speaker states 'There is no refutation from the government on that' regarding the defendant's travel, and refers to 'the lies that the government laid out' regarding financial means, indicating an adversarial legal relationship.
Sabhnani defendants
→
Alleged enslaver/enslaved
→
two individuals
The allegation was that the defendants have held two individuals in slavery for five years.
The speaker ('I') addresses 'your Honor' and 'Judge' directly, responding to questions and presenting arguments in a court setting.
Key Quotes (3)
"Defendant is a citizen of more than one country, England and France, not exactly exotic places. The defendant has three passports. The defendant has traveled internationally in the past, not in the past year. There is no refutation from the government on that, and they have been all over her travel records. The defendant has resided here in the past year. She has traveled internationally and, according to the government, she has financial means."Source
— I
(Describing the background and circumstances of the current defendant in the case.)
DOJ-OGR-00001053.jpg
Quote #1
"What do those cases teach? They teach that that is something the court can and should address in the bail conditions. They don't teach that they may require stricter bail conditions. They don't teach that that means there should be no bail at all."Source
— I
(Arguing about the interpretation of legal precedents regarding bail conditions.)
DOJ-OGR-00001053.jpg
Quote #2
"In Sabhnani, a Second Circuit case, the allegation was that the defendants have held two individuals in slavery for five years, and they had many more international ties or international"Source
— I
(Citing the Sabhnani case as a precedent relevant to the discussion of bail conditions and international ties.)
DOJ-OGR-00001053.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,697 characters)
Case 21-770, Document 20-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page112 of 200
k7e2MaxC kjc
1 that are relevant to that, which I was going to get to, your
2 Honor, are Khashoggi, U.S. v. Khashoggi, U.S. v. Bodmer, U.S.
3 v. Hanson, and Sabhnani itself, all of which involve defendants
4 with substantial connections.
5 And I might follow up on your Honor's question, when
6 you take off the spin and you take off the media -- and I'm
7 going to get to it in a moment, because your Honor is going to
8 allow me to respond -- here is their case: Defendant is a
9 citizen of more than one country, England and France, not
10 exactly exotic places. The defendant has three passports. The
11 defendant has traveled internationally in the past, not in the
12 past year. There is no refutation from the government on that,
13 and they have been all over her travel records. The defendant
14 has resided here in the past year. She has traveled
15 internationally and, according to the government, she has
16 financial means. I will get to that in a moment, Judge. But
17 let's assume for the purposes of this discussion that she has
18 financial means and not the lies that the government laid out.
19 What do those cases teach? They teach that that is something
20 the court can and should address in the bail conditions. They
21 don't teach that they may require stricter bail conditions. They
22 don't teach that that means there should be no bail at all. In
23 Sabhnani, a Second Circuit case, the allegation was that the
24 defendants have held two individuals in slavery for five years,
25 and they had many more international ties or international
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00001053
k7e2MaxC kjc
1 that are relevant to that, which I was going to get to, your
2 Honor, are Khashoggi, U.S. v. Khashoggi, U.S. v. Bodmer, U.S.
3 v. Hanson, and Sabhnani itself, all of which involve defendants
4 with substantial connections.
5 And I might follow up on your Honor's question, when
6 you take off the spin and you take off the media -- and I'm
7 going to get to it in a moment, because your Honor is going to
8 allow me to respond -- here is their case: Defendant is a
9 citizen of more than one country, England and France, not
10 exactly exotic places. The defendant has three passports. The
11 defendant has traveled internationally in the past, not in the
12 past year. There is no refutation from the government on that,
13 and they have been all over her travel records. The defendant
14 has resided here in the past year. She has traveled
15 internationally and, according to the government, she has
16 financial means. I will get to that in a moment, Judge. But
17 let's assume for the purposes of this discussion that she has
18 financial means and not the lies that the government laid out.
19 What do those cases teach? They teach that that is something
20 the court can and should address in the bail conditions. They
21 don't teach that they may require stricter bail conditions. They
22 don't teach that that means there should be no bail at all. In
23 Sabhnani, a Second Circuit case, the allegation was that the
24 defendants have held two individuals in slavery for five years,
25 and they had many more international ties or international
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00001053
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document