Hanson
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
jeffrey E.
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Hanson's husband
|
Friend |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal case | Discussion of the legal case 'U.S. v. Hanson' | N/A | View |
| N/A | Crime | Defendant Hanson was charged with violations of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act a... | United States | View |
| 2017-11-23 | N/A | Thanksgiving gathering | Implied Florida/Palm Beach ... | View |
| 2008-01-01 | Residency | Defendant Hanson spent only 22 days in the United States during 2008. | United States | View |
DOJ-OGR-00001926.jpg
This legal document discusses cases involving Khashoggi, Bodmer, Hanson, and Sabhnani. It mentions a defendant who is a citizen of England and France and has three passports, and the document discusses the defendant's international travel and financial means.
DOJ-OGR-00001600.jpg
This document is page 20 of a legal filing (Document 18) dated July 10, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The text argues against the government's assertion that Maxwell is a flight risk, citing her isolation as a protective measure rather than an attempt to flee, and noting that wealth and foreign citizenship alone are insufficient grounds for detention without proof of 'inclination' to flee. It also argues that COVID-19 travel restrictions make flight unlikely and mentions in a footnote that individuals in the media (specifically in the UK) are falsely claiming to have ties to her.
DOJ-OGR-00001584.jpg
This document is page 4 (labeled 'iii') of a legal filing, specifically a Table of Authorities listing case law citations. It was filed on July 10, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell). The page lists various legal precedents cited in the brief, including 'United States v. Epstein' (2019) and 'United States v. Kashoggi', referencing rulings from the S.D.N.Y., 2nd Circuit, and other jurisdictions regarding bail or detention issues (inferred from the statute 18 U.S.C. § 3142).
DOJ-OGR-00001136.jpg
This document is page 35 of a legal filing (Document 102) dated December 14, 2020, arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. It contends that her proposed $28.5 million bond package exceeds necessary requirements for ensuring her presence in court. The document features a table comparing Maxwell's proposed bail conditions (including private security and electronic monitoring) to those of other high-profile defendants like Bernie Madoff and Khashoggi, highlighting that her package is stricter than those previously granted release.
DOJ-OGR-00001053.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal transcript dated April 1, 2021, where an attorney argues about bail conditions for a defendant. The attorney references several legal precedents (Khashoggi, Bodmer, Hanson, Sabhnani) to assert that international ties and financial means should lead to stricter bail conditions, not a denial of bail. The current defendant is described as a citizen of England and France with three passports, who has traveled internationally and has financial means, and the attorney cites the Sabhnani case, which involved allegations of holding individuals in slavery, to support their argument regarding bail.
DOJ-OGR-00000960.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' page (page iii) from a legal filing (Document 18) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on July 10, 2020. It lists various legal precedents cited in the brief, including 'United States v. Epstein' (2019) and several other cases regarding bail and detention, referencing 18 U.S.C. § 3142.
DOJ-OGR-00000450.jpg
This document is page 6 of a legal filing dated July 16, 2019, addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman. The author asserts that Epstein consistently notified New Mexico official Detective Deborah Anaya of his presence at his residence there. The filing also counters a point made by the judge, arguing against the idea that sex offender recidivism rates increase after 15 years by citing studies suggesting the risk of relapse substantially drops over time for offense-free individuals.
DOJ-OGR-00000436.jpg
This document is page 6 of a legal filing dated July 16, 2019, addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman. The author refutes the judge's suggestion that sex offender recidivism rates increase after 15 years, citing two studies that conclude the opposite. The document also mentions a New Mexico detective, Deborah Anaya, and speculation by a third-party counsel, Mr. Boies, regarding alleged payments in late 2018.
DOJ-OGR-00000286.jpg
This document is a legal filing, page 13 of a motion in the case against Mr. Epstein, arguing for his pretrial release. It cites several legal precedents (United States v. Karni, United States v. Hanson, and Sabhnani) where courts ordered the release of defendants despite them being foreign nationals, having few ties to the U.S., facing serious charges, and substantial evidence of guilt. The core argument is that the potential for a significant sentence does not automatically preclude pretrial release.
DOJ-OGR-00002012.jpg
This legal document, filed on December 14, 2020, argues for the approval of a proposed $28.5 million bail package for defendant Ms. Maxwell. It contends that this package is more than sufficient to ensure her appearance in court by comparing it to the less restrictive bail conditions of other high-profile defendants with significant financial means and foreign citizenships. A table is provided to illustrate these precedents, detailing bond amounts and conditions for defendants such as Madoff, Khashoggi, and others.
DOJ-OGR-00019878.jpg
This document is page 'iii' (Table of Authorities) from a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It lists legal precedents cited within the brief, including 'United States v. Epstein' (2019) and 'United States v. Salerno' (1987), along with a citation to 18 U.S.C. § 3142 regarding bail/detention. The page bears a Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00019878.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026234.jpg
An email chain from Thanksgiving Day 2017 between Faith Kates and Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeffrey E.' and email 'jeevacation@gmail.com'). Faith asks Jeffrey about his location and company; Jeffrey responds that he is with 'david fizel. hanson. trump' and mentions 'eva'. Faith refers to one of the individuals as 'a snooze' and mentions that 'dylan' will want to see Jeffrey.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity