This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing an afternoon session where the Court addresses matters that arose during a luncheon recess, including a financial affidavit from Ms. Conrad and a voice mail she left stating she would not attend the hearing. The transcript also covers an examination by Mr. Gair and Mr. Okula regarding a prior conversation on December 20th with Judge Pauley about 'The Answerer's' financial ability to hire a lawyer and their personal finances, which 'The Answerer' claimed were irrelevant.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Paul M. Daugerdas | Defendant/Party in case |
Named in the case title 'UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,'.
|
| MR. GAIR | Counsel/Examiner |
Participating in the inquiry/examination, addressing the Court and questioning 'The Answerer'.
|
| THE COURT | Judge/Court |
Presiding over the inquiry, making statements, asking questions, and managing the proceedings.
|
| Judge Pauley | Judge |
Mentioned as having a prior conversation with 'The Answerer' regarding their finances and ability to hire a lawyer; a...
|
| Ms. Sternheim | Unknown |
Presented a financial affidavit which she received from Ms. Conrad.
|
| Ms. Conrad | Witness/Party involved |
Provided a financial affidavit, left a voice mail message stating she would not attend the hearing, and is the subjec...
|
| Catherine Conrad | Witness/Party involved |
Identified as the speaker in the voice mail message, same person as Ms. Conrad.
|
| MR. OKULA | Counsel/Examiner |
Participating in the inquiry/examination, addressing the Court.
|
| The Answerer | Witness/Defendant (person being questioned) |
The individual responding to questions from counsel and the court regarding their finances and prior interactions wit...
|
| Court's deputy | Deputy |
Had a conversation with Ms. Conrad prior to her voice mail message.
|
| Client of questioning counsel | Client |
Referred to by 'The Answerer' as someone against whom a guilty verdict was rendered.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | Government agency |
Plaintiff in the legal case.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS | Company |
Transcribing the court proceedings.
|
"Hi, it's Catherine Conrad. I won't be showing up to the hearing today. Thank you."Source
"Have you any cash on hand or money in savings or checking accounts?"Source
"As opposed to what? As opposed next month or as opposed to what? That's not -- I don't understand what you're saying, sir."Source
"My personal finances have nothing to do with this. Thank you. They have nothing to do with this. I can get counsel any time I want, federal or state. Thank you, sir."Source
"If that's what it sets, then that's what I said, sir."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (4,920 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document