Event Details
December 20, 2011
Description
Judge Pauley attempted to determine 'The Answerer's' financial ability to hire a lawyer.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Answerer | person | 2 | View Entity |
| Judge Pauley | person | 146 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009246.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing an afternoon session where the Court addresses matters that arose during a luncheon recess, including a financial affidavit from Ms. Conrad and a voice mail she left stating she would not attend the hearing. The transcript also covers an examination by Mr. Gair and Mr. Okula regarding a prior conversation on December 20th with Judge Pauley about 'The Answerer's' financial ability to hire a lawyer and their personal finances, which 'The Answerer' claimed were irrelevant.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
A hearing where the witness made statements to Judge Pauley that are the subject of the current examination.
2011-12-20 • Courtroom
Witness Conrad swore to Judge Pauley on March 2nd that she lived in Bronxville.
Date unknown • Courtroom
Judge Pauley explained the purpose of voir dire to the jury pool (venire), including Ms. Conrad.
Date unknown • Federal Court
Afternoon session of a court inquiry, addressing matters that developed over the luncheon recess, including a financial affidavit from Ms. Conrad and her voice mail message. Examination of 'The Answerer' regarding finances.
2012-02-15 • Court
A past voir dire process is discussed, where the plan was for Judge Pauley to question potential juror Catherine M. Conrad to determine if she was the same person from a court opinion.
Date unknown
Judge Pauley questioned Conrad about their residence history and property ownership, during which Conrad provided false answers.
2012-02-15 • Courtroom
The witness, Ms. Conrad, is testifying under court order.
2012-02-15 • Courtroom
A subpoena was served on the witness by Judge Pauley.
2011-12-20
A prior hearing which the witness, Conrad, was compelled to attend.
2011-12-20 • Courtroom
The jury selection process for a trial that was expected to be very long. A key issue was the availability of jurors. A potential juror with a criminal record (turnstile jumping, lookout for burglary) was considered but not challenged.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event