Trove
Sign In Sign Up

EFTA00019238.pdf

99.1 KB
← Back to List View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
5
Organizations
3
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email chain
File Size: 99.1 KB
Summary

An email chain from July 2020 between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) and the Office of the Deputy Attorney General (ODAG). The correspondence concerns coordinating document discovery for the recently charged Ghislaine Maxwell case, specifically revisiting materials related to the Southern District of Florida (SDFL) investigation and the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The emails mention that the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) conducted a significant document collection the previous year.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Redacted (USANYS) Chief, Public Corruption Unit
Initiated the email chain discussing document discovery for the Maxwell case.
Redacted (ODAG) Associate Deputy Attorney General
Respondent in the email chain, discussing availability and role in recusal issues.
Jeffrey Epstein Deceased Defendant
Mentioned in context of the previous case and his death mooting previous discussions.
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Mentioned as recently charged, prompting the renewed need for document discovery.

Organizations (5)

Name Type Context
USANYS (U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York)
ODAG (Office of the Deputy Attorney General)
SDFL (Southern District of Florida)
NDGA (Northern District of Georgia)
OPR (Office of Professional Responsibility)

Timeline (3 events)

2019
OPR significant document collection
Unknown
OPR
View
2019-07
Epstein case charged (approximate date based on 'last summer')
New York
Jeffrey Epstein
View
2020-07
Ghislaine Maxwell charged
New York
Ghislaine Maxwell USANYS
View

Locations (3)

Location Context
New York
Florida
Georgia

Relationships (1)

USANYS Official → Professional/Interagency → ODAG Official
Email correspondence coordinating on legal strategy and document discovery.

Key Quotes (4)

"we've recently charged Ghislaine Maxwell and, anticipating potentially similar issues, we were hoping to revisit those conversations."
Source
EFTA00019238.pdf
Quote #1
"I also know OPR did a significant document collection last year."
Source
EFTA00019238.pdf
Quote #2
"Now that the CVRA litigation is over, you probably are best going directly to SDFL, as I don't have any of their documents."
Source
EFTA00019238.pdf
Quote #3
"Those conversations were largely at mooted at the time by Epstein's death"
Source
EFTA00019238.pdf
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (3,263 characters)

From: [Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>
To: [Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Epstein/Maxwell
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 17:36:26 +0000
Yes, thanks
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 1:34 PM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: FW: Epstein/Maxwell
12 tomorrow works for you, right? If so, I can propose that or something Friday morning in the alternative?
From: [Redacted] (ODAG) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 1:03 PM
To: [Redacted] (ODAG) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Epstein/Maxwell
Hi [Redacted],
I'm happy to assist you. I'm available Thursday or Friday to discuss what documents you are trying to locate. Please let me know if you have availability on either of those days.
Thanks,
[Redacted]
From: [Redacted] (ODAG) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 12:49 PM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (ODAG) <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Epstein/Maxwell
Thanks. OPR and [Redacted] may have a better sense on document custodians than do I. [Redacted].
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 12:41 PM
To: [Redacted] (ODAG) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (ODAG) <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Epstein/Maxwell
Thanks, [Redacted]. Among our questions was who, whether at ODAG, SDFL, or NDGA we should be in touch with at this point regarding documents. I also know OPR did a significant document collection last year.
We will reach back to OPR, but if there is a particular point of contact at SDFL or NDGA on issues related to document collection, in particular, please let us know. And if a call on those issues would be helpful, happy to set one up.
EFTA00019238
[Page 2]
Thanks very much,
[Redacted]
From: [Redacted] (ODAG) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 10:56 AM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (ODAG) <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Epstein/Maxwell
Happy to talk, but my only real role related to recusal issues and consequences. Now that the CVRA litigation is over, you probably are best going directly to SDFL, as I don't have any of their documents. Thanks, [Redacted].
[Redacted]
Associate Deputy Attorney General
Office: [Redacted]
Cell: [Redacted]
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2020 6:23 PM
To: [Redacted] (ODAG) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: Epstein/Maxwell
[Redacted] -- Hope all is well. We had spoken last summer, after the Epstein case was charged, about some potential document/discovery requests related to the SDFL investigation and the NPA, in particular. Those conversations were largely at mooted at the time by Epstein's death, but as I'm sure you know, we've recently charged Ghislaine Maxwell and, anticipating potentially similar issues, we were hoping to revisit those conversations. Do you have time later this week for a quick call? If so, please let us know what might work for you.
Thanks very much,
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
Chief, Public Corruption Unit
U.S. Attorney's Office for the
Southern District of New York
Tel. [Redacted]
EFTA00019239
View Original PDF

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document