DOJ-OGR-00005624.jpg
394 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
6
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
394 KB
Summary
This legal document, filed on October 29, 2021, is a letter from the United States Attorney's office regarding the admissibility of evidence in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It states that certain evidence is admissible as direct evidence of the crimes charged, negating the need for an in limine motion, and notes that the letter itself is designated as "confidential" under a July 31, 2020 Protective Order.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| DAMIAN WILLIAMS | United States Attorney |
Signatory of the letter
|
| Alison Moe | Assistant United States Attorney |
Listed as an author/signer of the letter
|
| Lara Pomerantz | Assistant United States Attorney |
Listed as an author/signer of the letter
|
| Andrew Rohrbach | Assistant United States Attorney |
Listed as an author/signer of the letter
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States Attorney | Government agency |
Office of Damian Williams and the Assistant US Attorneys
|
| Government | Government agency |
Refers to the prosecution in the case, stating it is not planning to move in limine
|
Relationships (6)
Damian Williams is the United States Attorney, and Alison Moe is an Assistant United States Attorney, implying a hierarchical professional relationship.
Damian Williams is the United States Attorney, and Lara Pomerantz is an Assistant United States Attorney, implying a hierarchical professional relationship.
Damian Williams is the United States Attorney, and Andrew Rohrbach is an Assistant United States Attorney, implying a hierarchical professional relationship.
Both are Assistant United States Attorneys and co-signers of the letter.
Both are Assistant United States Attorneys and co-signers of the letter.
Both are Assistant United States Attorneys and co-signers of the letter.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (890 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 385-1 Filed 10/29/21 Page 3 of 3
Page 2
Page 2
This evidence is admissible as direct evidence of the crimes charged and, in the alternative,
pursuant to Rule 404(b) as proof of the defendant’s intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity,
and/or absence of mistake of accident with respect to the charges in the above-referenced case.
Because this evidence is admissible as direct evidence, the Government is not planning to
affirmatively move in limine to seek its admission.
pursuant to Rule 404(b) as proof of the defendant’s intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity,
and/or absence of mistake of accident with respect to the charges in the above-referenced case.
Because this evidence is admissible as direct evidence, the Government is not planning to
affirmatively move in limine to seek its admission.
Please note that this letter and the information contained herein is governed by the July 31,
2020 Protective Order in this case. This letter is itself designated as “confidential” under the
Protective Order.
2020 Protective Order in this case. This letter is itself designated as “confidential” under the
Protective Order.
Very truly yours,
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
United States Attorney
United States Attorney
by: /s
Alison Moe
Lara Pomerantz
Andrew Rohrbach
Assistant United States Attorneys
(212) 637-2324
Alison Moe
Lara Pomerantz
Andrew Rohrbach
Assistant United States Attorneys
(212) 637-2324
DOJ-OGR-00005624
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document