DOJ-OGR-00013656.jpg
531 KB
Extraction Summary
7
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
11
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document (court transcript)
File Size:
531 KB
Summary
This document is an excerpt from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing a sidebar discussion in a legal case. Attorneys Ms. Pomerantz and Ms. Menninger, along with 'The Court,' debate the nature and admissibility of a 'prior consistent statement' and its implications for impeaching a witness. The discussion centers on a statement made by an unnamed individual to her mother, 'I wasn't raped,' and whether its elicitation would pose further legal problems.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| A. Farmer | Witness or party |
Subject of 'direct' examination
|
| MS. POMERANTZ | Attorney |
Speaking during court proceedings
|
| MS. MENNINGER | Attorney |
Speaking during court proceedings
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the proceedings, asking questions and making statements
|
| her | Unnamed individual |
A person whose story, potential impeachment, and statements are being discussed
|
| accusers | Unnamed individuals |
Group whose veracity was questioned in an opening statement
|
| her mom | Mother of an unnamed individual |
Recipient of a statement from the unnamed individual
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company (court reporting service) |
Entity responsible for transcribing the proceedings
|
| DOJ-OGR | Government agency |
Document tracking identifier, likely Department of Justice - Office of Government Relations
|
Timeline (1 events)
Discussion at sidebar regarding a prior consistent statement, potential impeachment of a witness, and the veracity of accusers.
Southern District (implied)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied location of the court proceedings by 'SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS'
|
Relationships (3)
Attorney addressing the judge ('your Honor')
Attorney addressing the judge ('your Honor')
Key Quotes (11)
"Is this not a prior consistent statement that was litigated or discussed?"Source
— THE COURT
(Questioning the nature of a statement)
DOJ-OGR-00013656.jpg
Quote #1
"This is a prior consistent statement, your Honor."Source
— MS. POMERANTZ
(Affirming the nature of a statement)
DOJ-OGR-00013656.jpg
Quote #2
"Your Honor, I don't believe that we have impeached her yet or called her story into question in opening about this issue. So I'm a little -- I understand that eventually it may be, if I do impeach her."Source
— MS. MENNINGER
(Discussing the status of witness impeachment)
DOJ-OGR-00013656.jpg
Quote #3
"The opening questioned the veracity of all of the accusers."Source
— THE COURT
(Clarifying the scope of previous statements)
DOJ-OGR-00013656.jpg
Quote #4
"Not on every point, your Honor. I mean --"Source
— MS. MENNINGER
(Responding to the Court's clarification)
DOJ-OGR-00013656.jpg
Quote #5
"Not that she was there, for example, or anything like that. So I don't believe that it's been opened, and I think it's just bolstering."Source
— MS. MENNINGER
(Arguing against the admissibility or relevance of a statement)
DOJ-OGR-00013656.jpg
Quote #7
"Well, is the statement just that she's going to be there or what's -- what is the anticipated statement?"Source
— THE COURT
(Seeking clarification on the content of the anticipated statement)
DOJ-OGR-00013656.jpg
Quote #8
"Actually, my reading of the discovery is that she told her mom, I wasn't raped. And so if that's what is planned to be elicited, that's going to be a problem for a lot of other reasons that have been litigated."Source
— MS. MENNINGER
(Revealing the content of a statement and its potential issues)
DOJ-OGR-00013656.jpg
Quote #9
"I wasn't raped."Source
— Unnamed individual (quoted by MS. MENNINGER)
(A statement made by an unnamed individual to her mother, as revealed in discovery)
DOJ-OGR-00013656.jpg
Quote #10
"Is that what she's going to say?"Source
— THE COURT
(Confirming the anticipated testimony)
DOJ-OGR-00013656.jpg
Quote #11
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,295 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 65 of 267 2093
LCAVMAX2 A. Farmer - direct
LCAVMAX2 A. Farmer - direct
1 (At sidebar)
2 THE COURT: Is this not a prior consistent statement
3 that was litigated or discussed?
4 MS. POMERANTZ: This is a prior consistent statement,
5 your Honor.
6 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I don't believe that we
7 have impeached her yet or called her story into question in
8 opening about this issue. So I'm a little -- I understand that
9 eventually it may be, if I do impeach her.
10 THE COURT: The opening questioned the veracity of all
11 of the accusers.
12 MS. MENNINGER: Not on every point, your Honor. I
13 mean --
14 THE COURT: Okay.
15 MS. MENNINGER: Not that she was there, for example,
16 or anything like that. So I don't believe that it's been
17 opened, and I think it's just bolstering.
18 THE COURT: Well, is the statement just that she's
19 going to be there or what's -- what is the anticipated
20 statement?
21 MS. MENNINGER: Actually, my reading of the discovery
22 is that she told her mom, I wasn't raped. And so if that's
23 what is planned to be elicited, that's going to be a problem
24 for a lot of other reasons that have been litigated.
25 THE COURT: Is that what she's going to say?
2 THE COURT: Is this not a prior consistent statement
3 that was litigated or discussed?
4 MS. POMERANTZ: This is a prior consistent statement,
5 your Honor.
6 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I don't believe that we
7 have impeached her yet or called her story into question in
8 opening about this issue. So I'm a little -- I understand that
9 eventually it may be, if I do impeach her.
10 THE COURT: The opening questioned the veracity of all
11 of the accusers.
12 MS. MENNINGER: Not on every point, your Honor. I
13 mean --
14 THE COURT: Okay.
15 MS. MENNINGER: Not that she was there, for example,
16 or anything like that. So I don't believe that it's been
17 opened, and I think it's just bolstering.
18 THE COURT: Well, is the statement just that she's
19 going to be there or what's -- what is the anticipated
20 statement?
21 MS. MENNINGER: Actually, my reading of the discovery
22 is that she told her mom, I wasn't raped. And so if that's
23 what is planned to be elicited, that's going to be a problem
24 for a lot of other reasons that have been litigated.
25 THE COURT: Is that what she's going to say?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013656
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document