DOJ-OGR-00002357(2).jpg
565 KB
Extraction Summary
8
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
565 KB
Summary
This legal document, filed on February 4, 2021, discusses a July 2016 deposition of Maxwell. It states that a superseding indictment alleges Maxwell committed perjury during this deposition by providing false testimony about her knowledge of sexual activities at Epstein's Palm Beach house. The document notes that a district court had previously compelled her testimony over privacy objections, believing a protective order was sufficient.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Maxwell | Defendant/Deponent |
Subject of a deposition in July 2016 and a superseding indictment alleging she provided false testimony.
|
| Epstein |
Mentioned in relation to his Palm Beach house and alleged sexual activities.
|
|
| Accuser-2 | Accuser |
Mentioned as a person to whom Maxwell allegedly gave a massage. Referred to as Minor Victim-2 in the indictment.
|
| Minor Victim-1 | Accuser/Victim |
Mentioned in a footnote as the indictment's term for an accuser, referred to as Accuser-1 in this document.
|
| Minor Victim-2 | Accuser/Victim |
Mentioned in a footnote as the indictment's term for an accuser, referred to as Accuser-2 in this document.
|
| Minor Victim-3 | Accuser/Victim |
Mentioned in a footnote as the indictment's term for an accuser, referred to as Accuser-3 in this document.
|
| Accuser-1 | Accuser |
Mentioned in a footnote as the term this document will use for Minor Victim-1.
|
| Accuser-3 | Accuser |
Mentioned in a footnote as the term this document will use for Minor Victim-3.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| district court | government agency |
Mentioned as having granted a motion requiring Maxwell to answer intrusive questions.
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where alleged sexual activities took place, which were the subject of Maxwell's deposition testimony.
|
Key Quotes (2)
"relating to [her] own sexual activity” and “her knowledge of the sexual activity of others,"Source
— district court
(Describing the highly intrusive questions the district court required Maxwell to answer.)
DOJ-OGR-00002357(2).jpg
Quote #1
"privacy concerns are alleviated by the protective order in this case."Source
— district court
(The court's holding regarding Maxwell's privacy concerns about her testimony.)
DOJ-OGR-00002357(2).jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,453 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 134 Filed 02/04/21 Page 10 of 23
The district court granted the motion. In requiring Maxwell to answer highly intrusive questions “relating to [her] own sexual activity” and “her knowledge of the sexual activity of others,” the court held that Maxwell’s “privacy concerns are alleviated by the protective order in this case.”
Secure in the belief that the Protective Order would be honored, Maxwell appeared at a second deposition, in July 2016, and answered hundreds of pages worth of questions about [REDACTED] and [REDACTED]. From the very first question, Maxwell discussed [REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]. She was asked [REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED].
She was asked [REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED].
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]. She was asked [REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED].
She was asked [REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED].
Count Six of the superseding indictment alleges that Maxwell provided false testimony when she testified during her July 2016 deposition that: (1) she could not recall whether sex toys or devices were used in sexual activities at Epstein’s Palm Beach house; (2) she did not know whether Epstein possessed sex toys or devices used in sexual activities; (3) she wasn’t aware that Epstein was having sexual activities with anyone other than herself when she was with him; and (4) she never gave anyone, including Accuser-2³, a massage.
³ The indictment refers to the accusers as Minor Victim-1, Minor Victim-2, and Minor Victim-3. We will refer to them as Accuser-1, Accuser-2, and Accuser-3.
5
DOJ-OGR-00002357
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document