Accuser-3
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Epstein
|
Alleged abuser victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Accuser-1
|
Unrelated |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Alleged grooming facilitation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Defendant accuser |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Victim perpetrator alleged |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Alleged perpetrator victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Alleged sexual contact |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Defendant accuser |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Alleged victim perpetrator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser victim alleged |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Defendant victim alleged |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Alleged facilitator victim |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Alleged criminal conduct | Alleged "sexual abuse" of Accuser-2 and Accuser-3 by Epstein, in which the government alleges Ms.... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alleged 'sexual abuse' involving Accuser-3 | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | Alleged crime | Alleged sex acts between Epstein and Accuser-3 while Accuser-3 was underage. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alleged massages of Epstein by Accuser-3 | England | View |
| N/A | Alleged criminal act | Accuser-3 was purportedly “encouraged” to provide massages to Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Meeting | Ms. Maxwell's interactions with Accuser-3. | England | View |
| N/A | Alleged conduct | Alleged conduct between Ghislaine Maxwell and Accuser-3. | England | View |
| 2021-11-19 | Court filing | Issuance of an ORDER that GRANTS in part and DENIES in part the Defendant's motion to exclude evi... | null | View |
| 2021-10-29 | Legal filing | Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell filed a motion in limine to exclude evidence related to Accuser-3. | Court | View |
| 1994-01-01 | N/A | Alleged conspiracy and overt acts violating the Mann Act involving Maxwell, Epstein, and three ac... | New York, Florida, New Mexi... | View |
| 1994-01-01 | Introduction | Ms. Maxwell allegedly introduced Accuser-3 to Epstein and arranged for multiple interactions. | London, England | View |
| 1994-01-01 | Alleged abuse | Epstein allegedly "sexually abused" Accuser-3 during massages that Ms. Maxwell encouraged. | London, England | View |
| 1994-01-01 | Milestone | By 1994 at the earliest, Accuser-3 had reached age 16, the legal age of consent in England. | England | View |
| 1994-01-01 | Interaction/grooming | Ms. Maxwell allegedly "groomed and befriended" Accuser-3. | London, England | View |
EFTA00031918.pdf
This document is a Reply Memorandum filed on March 16, 2021, by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team in support of her third motion for bail. The defense proposes a comprehensive bail package including a $28.5 million bond, asset monitoring by a retired federal judge, and renunciation of her British and French citizenships to mitigate flight risk concerns. Attached as Exhibit A is a legal opinion from French attorney William Julié arguing that if Maxwell renounces her French citizenship, she would no longer be protected from extradition by France, countering the French Ministry of Justice's position.
EFTA00028278.pdf
This document is an email dated November 12, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to a colleague. The sender requests the preparation of a binder for an upcoming court appearance on the following Monday, attaching various legal documents related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, including motions regarding 'MV-3' (Minor Victim 3), expert witnesses Dietz and Loftus, and responses to the defense.
EFTA00027663.pdf
This document contains an email chain from November 2021 regarding the criminal case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense attorney Christian Everdell submits a response to the government's letters concerning 'Accuser-3's evidence' to Judge Nathan's chambers, filing the document under temporary seal to allow for potential redactions. The correspondence also lists other defense team members including Jeff Pagliuca, Laura Menninger, and Bobbi Sternheim.
EFTA00023365.pdf
An email from the Southern District of New York (Government) to Judge Nathan's chambers regarding the case US v. Maxwell. The email submits proposed redactions related to 'Witness-3' (also referred to as Accuser-3 in attachments) pursuant to previous court orders and motions.
EFTA00016206.pdf
This document is a motion in limine filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team on October 18, 2021, seeking to exclude evidence offered by the government under Rule 404(b) due to lack of proper notice. The defense argues the government failed to identify specific evidence or articulate a non-propensity purpose for its admission. The motion references disputed evidence including emails between Maxwell and 'influential men' regarding dates, testimony from a former Epstein employee (2005-06) regarding 'sexualized massages,' and various exhibits including flight logs (GX-661 & 662) and financial statements.
EFTA00011163.pdf
An email dated October 19, 2021, from an Assistant US Attorney (SDNY) to a colleague regarding 'Defense MIL 4'. The sender requests a discussion on how to respond to the defense's motion, noting the recipient had briefed a similar issue previously. The email includes an attachment titled '4._Motion_to_Exclude_Accuser-3_Evidence.pdf', likely relating to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial.
DOJ-OGR-00001262.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated March 23, 2021. It argues that the government's case is weakening, citing the 2007 Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement as a bar to prosecution and claiming the government cannot prove Accuser-3 was a minor during alleged interstate travel. The defense also alleges that prosecutors misled a federal judge to obtain evidence, undermining the integrity of the case.
DOJ-OGR-00020696.jpg
This document is a court docket from November 22, 2021, detailing numerous filings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan. The entries include an order regarding the testimony of 'Witness-3', an endorsement about providing a video monitor, and a series of letters and motions from both the prosecution (USA) and the defense. These filings address various pre-trial matters such as redactions, subpoenas, and the admissibility of evidence like birth certificates and testimony from 'Accuser-3'.
DOJ-OGR-00020694.jpg
This document is a court docket log from the SDNY case against Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 19, 2021. It details orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding a motion in limine to exclude evidence from 'Accuser-3' (Witness-3), ultimately ruling that testimony regarding Maxwell introducing the witness to Epstein and facilitating sexualized massages is admissible as evidence of Mann Act counts. It also mentions a letter from the prosecution team and procedural orders regarding the sealing and redaction of documents.
DOJ-OGR-00020689.jpg
This document is a court docket report from the SDNY (Case 22-1426/20-cr-330) dated November 12, 2021. It details multiple 'Motions in Limine' filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Pagliuca) seeking to suppress evidence, including items seized from 358 El Brillo Way in 2005, expert testimony, and specific government exhibits. The document also includes the Government's opposition to these motions and an order from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding public access and sealing procedures.
DOJ-OGR-00020688.jpg
This document is a court docket report (Case 22-1426, SDNY) from November 2021 details legal proceedings in the US v. Ghislaine Maxwell case. It lists various filings including orders on redactions to protect victim privacy, motions in limine regarding 'Accuser-3' and co-conspirator statements, and a dispute over an unauthenticated hearsay document (Exhibit 52). The docket reflects active pre-trial litigation between the prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz, Rohrbach) and defense counsel (Pagliuca, Everdell) regarding the admissibility of evidence and pseudonym logistics.
DOJ-OGR-00020681.jpg
This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, printed in 2023 as part of an appeal or related filing. It lists filings from late October and early November 2021, including multiple Motions in Limine by the defense attempting to exclude evidence regarding 'flight' logs, terms like 'victim', items seized from a 2005 search of 358 El Brillo Way, and alleged rape by Jeffrey Epstein. It also includes judicial orders regarding hearing schedules for Rule 412 (sexual behavior evidence) and Daubert (expert witness) motions, as well as orders regarding legal mail issues at the MDC.
DOJ-OGR-00020551.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket in Case 22-1426, dated July 8, 2022, detailing several filings from November 19, 2021, related to the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries consist of letters and orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan concerning evidentiary matters, including the admissibility of Government Exhibit 52 and the anticipated testimony of a witness referred to as 'Accuser-3' and 'Witness-3'. The court orders address motions to exclude evidence and outline the process for redacting sensitive information, with a key focus on testimony about Maxwell's relationship with Mr. Epstein and her alleged role in facilitating sexual activity.
DOJ-OGR-00020547.jpg
This legal document, a docket sheet from Case 22-1426 dated July 8, 2022, details several court filings from November 12, 2021, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The filings include a memorandum from the USA opposing various defense motions and a reply from Maxwell's team. The document also contains a court order scheduling an in-person proceeding for November 15, 2021, at the Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse in New York, specifying the courtroom, overflow rooms for public access, and strict COVID-19 protocols for all attendees.
DOJ-OGR-00020538.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from October 27 to October 29, 2021. It details numerous 'motions in limine' filed by Maxwell's defense team (Pagliuca, Everdell) attempting to exclude specific evidence, including items seized from Epstein's Palm Beach home (358 El Brillo Way) in 2005, evidence related to 'Accuser-3', and an alleged flight. The document also records an order from Judge Nathan scheduling an in-person pretrial conference for November 1, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00020452.jpg
This document is a court docket summary from Case 22-1426, dated July 8, 2022, detailing numerous filings that occurred on November 22, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries consist of orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan and a series of letter motions from both the prosecution (USA) and the defense. The filings cover procedural matters such as proposed redactions, motions to quash subpoenas, admissibility of witness testimony (Witness-3), and evidence related to specific exhibits and accusers (Accuser-3).
DOJ-OGR-00020450.jpg
This document is a log of court filings from November 19, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan. The entries detail orders and a memorandum opinion concerning evidentiary motions, specifically the admissibility of Government Exhibit 52 and the testimony of a witness referred to as 'Accuser-3' and 'Witness-3'. The court is ruling on what testimony from this witness regarding her relationship with Maxwell and Mr. Epstein will be permissible, setting deadlines for the parties to propose redactions to court documents.
DOJ-OGR-00020446.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket (Case 22-1426, referencing SDNY Case 20-cr-330) dated November 12, 2021, detailing proceedings in the case USA vs. Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists filings related to various Motions in Limine regarding the exclusion of evidence (including items from a 2005 search of 358 El Brillo Way), suppression of identification, and expert testimony. It also contains a court order establishing protocols for an in-person proceeding on November 15, 2021, including COVID-19 measures and provisions for public and victim access via overflow rooms.
DOJ-OGR-00002357(2).jpg
This legal document, filed on February 4, 2021, discusses a July 2016 deposition of Maxwell. It states that a superseding indictment alleges Maxwell committed perjury during this deposition by providing false testimony about her knowledge of sexual activities at Epstein's Palm Beach house. The document notes that a district court had previously compelled her testimony over privacy objections, believing a protective order was sufficient.
DOJ-OGR-00002284.jpg
This document is page 6 of a legal filing (Document 120) dated January 25, 2021, from the case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines the 'Mann Act Counts' (Counts One through Four) of the indictment, detailing allegations that Maxwell conspired with Jeffrey Epstein between 1994 and 1997 to transport individuals for illegal sexual activity in New York, Florida, New Mexico, and London. It specifically notes the involvement of three accusers (Accuser-1, -2, and -3) and argues for the severance of Counts Five and Six to avoid juror confusion.
DOJ-OGR-00005666.jpg
This document is the table of contents for a legal filing (Document 387) in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. The filing outlines arguments to exclude evidence related to 'Accuser-3,' asserting it is inadmissible under evidence rules like 404(b) and 403. In the alternative, it requests the court to prevent the government and Accuser-3 from describing her as a 'Minor' or as having been 'Sexually Abused' by Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00005665.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing, specifically a 'Motion in Limine', submitted to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on October 29, 2021. The motion is filed on behalf of the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The purpose of the motion is to request the exclusion of evidence related to an individual identified as 'Accuser-3'.
DOJ-OGR-00002685.jpg
This document is page 10 of a legal defense filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on Feb 4, 2021. The text argues that the indictment fails to establish a conspiracy charge regarding 'Accuser-3' because there is no evidence of interstate or foreign travel (a requirement for federal jurisdiction), noting that the alleged incidents took place in England. Additionally, the defense argues that any charges related to Accuser-3 are time-barred by the statute of limitations.
DOJ-OGR-00002680.jpg
This document is a preliminary statement from a legal motion filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell on February 4, 2021. The defense requests that the Court strike allegations related to 'Accuser-3' from the indictment, arguing that the alleged conduct occurred in England where Accuser-3 was above the age of consent and did not involve travel. The motion claims the government is improperly using these allegations to bolster its case regarding Mann Act violations involving 'Accuser-1' and Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00002677.jpg
This document is the Table of Contents for a legal filing (Document 146) in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on February 4, 2021. The filing outlines arguments to strike references to 'Accuser-3' from the indictment, claiming they are surplusage, irrelevant to the alleged conspiracies, and unduly prejudicial to Ms. Maxwell. Alternatively, it argues the Government should be required to demonstrate the admissibility of evidence regarding Accuser-3.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity