DOJ-OGR-00001498.jpg

524 KB

Extraction Summary

8
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal correspondence / court filing (letter motion)
File Size: 524 KB
Summary

This document is the second page of a legal letter filed on July 5, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The US Attorney's office requests Judge Nathan exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act to allow for the transportation of the defendant from another district and to facilitate discussions regarding a protective order to shield the identities of victims and third parties during discovery. Defense counsel consented to this request.

People (8)

Name Role Context
Alison J. Nathan United States District Judge
Recipient of the letter
Audrey Strauss Acting United States Attorney
Official submitting the letter
Alex Rossmiller Assistant United States Attorney
Signatory
Alison Moe Assistant United States Attorney
Signatory
Maurene Comey Assistant United States Attorney
Signatory
Christian Everdell Defense Counsel
Copied on the correspondence
Mark Cohen Defense Counsel
Copied on the correspondence
Defendant Defendant
Subject of transportation and indictment (Implicitly Ghislaine Maxwell based on case number 1:20-cr-00330)

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
United States District Court
Judicial body handling the case
Southern District of New York
Prosecuting office location
Department of Justice
Implied by footer DOJ-OGR

Timeline (2 events)

2020-07-05
Filing of Document 5 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
Southern District of New York
US Attorneys Judge Alison J. Nathan
Future (relative to document)
Transportation of the defendant from another district
From another district to SDNY

Locations (1)

Location Context
Jurisdiction of the US Attorneys

Relationships (3)

Alex Rossmiller Subordinate/Superior Audrey Strauss
Rossmiller signs as Assistant US Attorney under Strauss
Christian Everdell Co-Counsel Mark Cohen
Both listed as Defense Counsel cc'd on the letter
Government (US Attorneys) Legal Adversaries Defense Counsel (Everdell/Cohen)
Government consulting with defense counsel regarding protective orders

Key Quotes (2)

"Such a protective order will be necessary to facilitate the production of discovery while also protecting, among other things, the privacy and identity of third parties, including victims of the conduct charged in the Indictment."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001498.jpg
Quote #1
"The Government has consulted with defense counsel, who consents to this request."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001498.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,384 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 5 Filed 07/05/20 Page 2 of 2
Honorable Alison J. Nathan
United States District Judge
July 5, 2020
Page 2
also intends to use the time until any initial appearance before Your Honor to discuss the terms of
a protective order with defense counsel. Such a protective order will be necessary to facilitate the
production of discovery while also protecting, among other things, the privacy and identity of third
parties, including victims of the conduct charged in the Indictment. Accordingly, the Government
respectfully requests that the Court exclude time both for the transportation of the defendant from
another district, see 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(F), and to allow the parties to engage in discussions
regarding a protective order, which will serve the interests of justice by facilitating the timely
production of discovery in a manner protective of the rights of third parties, including potential
victims. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7). The Government has consulted with defense counsel, who
consents to this request.
Respectfully submitted,
AUDREY STRAUSS
Acting United States Attorney
By: _________________________
Alex Rossmiller / Alison Moe / Maurene Comey
Assistant United States Attorneys
Southern District of New York
Tel: (212) 637-2415 / 2225 / 2324
Cc: Christian Everdell, Esq. (by email)
Mark Cohen, Esq. (by email)
DOJ-OGR-00001498

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document