Legal motion filed on August 11, 2009, in the Southern District of Florida, requesting to consolidate the case of Jane Doe No. 8 v. Jeffrey Epstein with the lead case Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein for discovery purposes. The document states that the case involves alleged sexual abuse in Palm Beach, Florida, in 2001. The motion was unopposed by the Defendant's counsel.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane Doe No. 8 | Plaintiff |
Alleged victim of sexual abuse by Jeffrey Epstein in 2001.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant |
Accused of sexual abuse in Palm Beach, Florida.
|
| Jane Doe No. 2 | Plaintiff (Related Case) |
Plaintiff in the lead consolidated case (08-CV-80119).
|
| Adam D. Horowitz | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 8; filed the motion.
|
| Stuart S. Mermelstein | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 8.
|
| Jack Alan Goldberger | Attorney |
Listed on Service List (Defense Counsel).
|
| Robert D. Critton | Attorney |
Listed on Service List (Defense Counsel).
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court, Southern District of Florida |
Court where the case is filed.
|
|
| Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. |
Attorneys for Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 8.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of alleged sexual abuse in 2001.
|
|
|
Address of Plaintiff's attorneys (18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218).
|
"This case involves the alleged sexual abuse of Jane Doe No. 8 in 2001 by Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach, Florida."Source
"The facts of this case arise from the same series of events as the multiple cases pending in this Court against Jeffrey Epstein"Source
"Defendant does not oppose the relief requested."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,805 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document