HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016814.jpg

2.05 MB

Extraction Summary

6
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Investigative exhibit / book excerpt or essay
File Size: 2.05 MB
Summary

This document is page 11 of a House Oversight Committee exhibit (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016814). It contains an essay or book excerpt discussing the history of cybernetics and artificial intelligence, specifically focusing on Norbert Wiener's 1950 book 'The Human Use of Human Beings.' The text highlights Wiener's early warnings about the dangers of technological control and commercialization, contrasting his views with contemporaries like John von Neumann and John McCarthy, who favored commercialization and the development of 'artificial intelligence' over Wiener's 'cybernetics.'

People (6)

Name Role Context
Norbert Wiener Subject / Author
Author of 'Cybernetics' and 'The Human Use of Human Beings'; expressed concerns about commercial exploitation of tech...
George Dyson Science Historian
Quoted in the text analyzing Wiener's work and predictions.
John von Neumann Scientist / Colleague
Colleague of Wiener; interested in commercialization of new technologies.
Claude Shannon Scientist / Colleague
Colleague of Wiener; interested in commercialization of new technologies.
John McCarthy Computer Pioneer
Disliked Wiener and the term 'Cybernetics'; coined the term 'artificial intelligence'.
Unidentified Narrator Author
Refers to themselves as 'I', mentions reading Wiener's book in Spring 2016.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
FBI
Mentioned in a quote by Wiener regarding propaganda techniques.
Jesuits / Catholic Church
Mentioned in a quote by Wiener regarding totalitarian religion.
House Oversight Committee
Implied by the footer stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.

Timeline (3 events)

1950
Norbert Wiener publishes 'The Human Use of Human Beings'.
Unknown
1954
Wiener publishes a revised, milder edition of his book under peer pressure.
Unknown
Spring 2016
The narrator reads the first edition of Wiener's book.
Narrator's Library
Narrator

Relationships (2)

Norbert Wiener Professional Colleagues (Conflict) John von Neumann
von Neumann... ran counter to the aspirations of many of Wiener's colleagues... interested in the commercialization
Norbert Wiener Professional Adversaries John McCarthy
John McCarthy disliked Wiener and refused to use Wiener's term 'Cybernetics.'

Key Quotes (4)

"We must cease to kiss the whip that lashes us."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016814.jpg
Quote #1
"threatening new Fascism dependent on the machine à gouverner"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016814.jpg
Quote #2
"our great merchant princes have looked upon the propaganda technique of the Russians, and have found that it is good"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016814.jpg
Quote #3
"Indeed, the heads of great laboratories are very much like Bishops, with their association with the powerful in all walks of life, and the dangers they incur of the carnal sins of pride and of lust for power."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016814.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,994 characters)

Two years after Cybernetics, in 1950, Norbert Wiener published The Human Use of Human Beings—a deeper story, in which he expressed his concerns about the runaway commercial exploitation and other unforeseen consequences of the new technologies of control. I didn’t read The Human Use of Human Beings until the spring of 2016, when I picked up my copy, a first edition, which was sitting in my library next to Cybernetics. What shocked me was the realization of just how prescient Wiener was in 1950 about what’s going on today. Although the first edition was a major bestseller—and, indeed, jump-started an important conversation—under pressure from his peers Wiener brought out a revised and milder edition in 1954, from which the original concluding chapter, "Voices of Rigidity," is conspicuously absent.
Science historian George Dyson points out that in this long-forgotten first edition, Wiener predicted the possibility of a "threatening new Fascism dependent on the machine à gouverner":
No elite escaped his criticism, from the Marxists and the Jesuits ("all of Catholicism is indeed essentially a totalitarian religion") to the FBI ("our great merchant princes have looked upon the propaganda technique of the Russians, and have found that it is good") and the financiers lending their support "to make American capitalism and the fifth freedom of the businessman supreme throughout the world." Scientists . . . received the same scrutiny given the Church: "Indeed, the heads of great laboratories are very much like Bishops, with their association with the powerful in all walks of life, and the dangers they incur of the carnal sins of pride and of lust for power."
This jeremiad did not go well for Wiener. As Dyson puts it:
These alarms were discounted at the time, not because Wiener was wrong about digital computing but because larger threats were looming as he completed his manuscript in the fall of 1949. Wiener had nothing against digital computing but was strongly opposed to nuclear weapons and refused to join those who were building digital computers to move forward on the thousand-times-more-powerful hydrogen bomb.
Since the original of The Human Use of Human Beings is now out of print, lost to us is Wiener’s cri de coeur, more relevant today than when he wrote it, sixty-eight years ago: "We must cease to kiss the whip that lashes us."
Mind, Thinking, Intelligence
Among the reasons we don’t hear much about "Cybernetics" today, two are central: First, although The Human Use of Human Beings was considered an important book in its time, it ran counter to the aspirations of many of Wiener’s colleagues, including John von Neumann and Claude Shannon, who were interested in the commercialization of the new technologies. Second, computer pioneer John McCarthy disliked Wiener and refused to use Wiener’s term "Cybernetics." McCarthy, in turn, coined the term "artificial intelligence" and became a founding father of that field.
11
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016814

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document