| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Joseph Weizenbaum
|
Intellectual disagreement |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Norbert Wiener
|
Professional adversaries |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
marvin minsky
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Joseph Weizenbaum
|
Intellectual debate |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1983-01-01 | N/A | Meeting regarding the Japanese 5th Generation AI consortium | New York | View |
| 1955-01-01 | N/A | Proposal printed containing the first usage of the phrase 'artificial intelligence' | N/A | View |
| 1950-01-01 | N/A | First efforts at developing artificial intelligence. | N/A | View |
This document appears to be a page (178) from an academic essay or book regarding the history and philosophy of Artificial Intelligence and its intersection with Art. It references the foundational 1955 AI proposal by McCarthy and Marvin Minsky (a known Epstein associate), discusses Google DeepMind, and analyzes artistic works by Philippe Parreno and mathematical models by John Horton Conway. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was collected as part of a congressional investigation, likely related to the inquiry into MIT Media Lab's funding and Minsky's ties to Epstein.
This document discusses the intersection of emerging artificial intelligence technologies and established human rights frameworks. It explores the ethical challenges of integrating non-human intelligences into society, referencing historical declarations of rights and debating whether machines can or should replace humans in roles requiring dignity and care. The text also touches on the necessity of making ethical decision-making explicit and algorithmic in the age of autonomous systems.
This document is page 20 of a larger text (likely an essay or book chapter) discussing the history of cybernetics and Artificial Intelligence. It critiques the predictions of Norbert Wiener and early AI researchers like Herbert Simon, John McCarthy, and Marvin Minsky, specifically noting how they overestimated the speed of AI development in the 1950s. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional investigation, likely related to Epstein's connections to scientists like Marvin Minsky.
The document is an excerpt from a narrative (likely by literary agent John Brockman) recounting his accidental entry into the world of science publishing. It describes replacing Richard Feynman at a conference in Big Sur, a late-night philosophical encounter with Alan Watts, and his subsequent career representing scientists like Gregory Bateson and John Lilly. The text concludes with a section titled 'The Long AI Winters,' detailing a 1983 meeting in New York involving AI pioneers Marvin Minsky, John McCarthy, and Edward Feigenbaum regarding Japanese advancements in computing.
This document is page 11 of a House Oversight Committee exhibit (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016814). It contains an essay or book excerpt discussing the history of cybernetics and artificial intelligence, specifically focusing on Norbert Wiener's 1950 book 'The Human Use of Human Beings.' The text highlights Wiener's early warnings about the dangers of technological control and commercialization, contrasting his views with contemporaries like John von Neumann and John McCarthy, who favored commercialization and the development of 'artificial intelligence' over Wiener's 'cybernetics.'
This text critiques the evolution of artificial intelligence from a theoretical simulation to a tool of capitalism and social control, contrasting these developments with artistic interpretations. It discusses the work of artist Philippe Parreno and mathematician John Horton Conway, exploring the boundaries between simulation and life through the lens of Conway's "Game of Life" and its implications for understanding complexity and consciousness.
This document appears to be a page (169) from a manuscript, essay, or book discussing transhumanism, artificial intelligence ethics, and the definition of human rights in the context of 'non-Homo intelligences.' It references historical legal frameworks like the Bill of Rights and the U.N. Declaration of Human Rights, while debating the capacity of machines to make ethical decisions compared to humans. The document bears a House Oversight Committee stamp, suggesting it was part of materials reviewed during a congressional investigation, likely related to scientific funding or associates connected to the Epstein case.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity