DOJ-OGR-00002360.jpg
601 KB
Extraction Summary
8
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
601 KB
Summary
This legal document, filed on February 4, 2021, argues that the government's prior representations about its investigation were false. It details how attorneys from Boies Schiller, including David Boies himself, approached the government in 2016 to urge an investigation into Epstein and Maxwell for sex trafficking and perjury, providing evidence from abused clients. A quote from David Boies highlights his firm's conviction that they could prove a "massive sex trafficking ring" was in operation.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Amanda Kramer | AUSA |
Met with attorneys from Boies Schiller on February 29, 2016, who urged her to open an investigation into Epstein and ...
|
| Epstein |
Subject of a potential investigation urged by attorneys from Boies Schiller.
|
|
| Maxwell |
Subject of a potential investigation urged by attorneys from Boies Schiller and potential perjury charges suggested b...
|
|
| David Boies | Attorney |
Approached the government in the summer of 2016 to ask about charging Maxwell with perjury. Quoted about having evide...
|
| Mr. Boies | Attorney |
Referenced as the speaker of a quote regarding clients who were abused.
|
| Stephen Rex Brown | Author |
Author of a New York Daily News article cited in a footnote.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein |
Mentioned in the title of a cited article as someone prosecutors declined to pursue in 2016.
|
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell |
Mentioned in the title of a cited article as someone prosecutors declined to pursue in 2016.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Boies Schiller | company |
Attorneys from this firm met with AUSA Amanda Kramer to urge an investigation.
|
| Southern District | government agency |
Mentioned in the context of David Boies asking if they would consider charging Maxwell with perjury.
|
| New York Daily News | company |
Publisher of an article cited in a footnote.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2016
David Boies approached the government asking if the Southern District would consider charging Maxwell with perjury.
2016-02-29
AUSA Amanda Kramer met with attorneys from Boies Schiller, who urged her to open an investigation of Epstein and Maxwell.
Amanda Kramer
attorneys from Boies Schiller
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in a footnote describing "Manhattan federal prosecutors".
|
Relationships (3)
David Boies approached the government to ask about charging Maxwell with perjury and stated he had evidence of a sex trafficking ring involving her.
Attorneys from David Boies' firm met with AUSA Amanda Kramer to urge an investigation.
Key Quotes (3)
"urged Kramer to open an investigation of” Epstein and Maxwell."Source
— attorneys from Boies Schiller
(Describing the purpose of the February 29, 2016 meeting with AUSA Amanda Kramer.)
DOJ-OGR-00002360.jpg
Quote #1
"if the Southern District would consider charging Maxwell with perjury."Source
— David Boies
(The question David Boies posed to the government in the summer of 2016.)
DOJ-OGR-00002360.jpg
Quote #2
"We were saying to anyone who would listen: We’ve got clients who were abused. Some of them were underage. We have the evidence. There’s a whole record that’s been developed. We can establish beyond any reasonable doubt there was a massive sex trafficking ring going on."Source
— Mr. Boies
(A quote from David Boies explaining his firm's efforts to bring attention to the case.)
DOJ-OGR-00002360.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,414 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 134 Filed 02/04/21 Page 13 of 23
[REDACTED TEXT]
Ex. E, 99 pp 2–3.
Those representations were false. At the time the government claims it began the
investigation ([REDACTED TEXT]), its knowledge of the civil case was not
based exclusively on public filings. It knew that [REDACTED TEXT] possessed relevant information
because [REDACTED TEXT] had come to the government asking it to open an investigation. In particular, on
February 29, 2016, AUSA Amanda Kramer met with attorneys from Boies Schiller, who “urged
Kramer to open an investigation of” Epstein and Maxwell.4 Then, after Maxwell’s two
depositions, David Boies himself apparently approached the government in the summer of 2016,
asking “if the Southern District would consider charging Maxwell with perjury.” Brown, supra
n.2. Said Mr. Boies:
investigation ([REDACTED TEXT]), its knowledge of the civil case was not
based exclusively on public filings. It knew that [REDACTED TEXT] possessed relevant information
because [REDACTED TEXT] had come to the government asking it to open an investigation. In particular, on
February 29, 2016, AUSA Amanda Kramer met with attorneys from Boies Schiller, who “urged
Kramer to open an investigation of” Epstein and Maxwell.4 Then, after Maxwell’s two
depositions, David Boies himself apparently approached the government in the summer of 2016,
asking “if the Southern District would consider charging Maxwell with perjury.” Brown, supra
n.2. Said Mr. Boies:
“We were saying to anyone who would listen: We’ve got clients who were abused.
Some of them were underage. We have the evidence. There’s a whole record that’s
been developed. We can establish beyond any reasonable doubt there was a massive
sex trafficking ring going on.”
Some of them were underage. We have the evidence. There’s a whole record that’s
been developed. We can establish beyond any reasonable doubt there was a massive
sex trafficking ring going on.”
Id.
4 Stephen Rex Brown, Manhattan federal prosecutors declined to pursue Jeffrey Epstein and
Ghislaine Maxwell case in 2016, New York Daily News (Oct. 13, 2020),
https://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/ny-jeffrey-epstein-maxwell-case-20201013-
jmzhl7zdrzdgrbbs7yc6bfnszu-story.html.
Ghislaine Maxwell case in 2016, New York Daily News (Oct. 13, 2020),
https://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/ny-jeffrey-epstein-maxwell-case-20201013-
jmzhl7zdrzdgrbbs7yc6bfnszu-story.html.
8
DOJ-OGR-00002360
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document