Mr. Boies
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
one of the victims
|
Client |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Parties in case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Roberts
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
victims
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MS. McCAWLEY
|
Professional co interviewees |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Dershowitz
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
recipients
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein's friends and employees
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Civil depositions where recipients invoked the Fifth Amendment. | New York and Florida | View |
| 2020-07-14 | Hearing | A detention hearing for Ms. Maxwell was held. | Court (virtual/remote parti... | View |
| 2020-07-14 | Detention hearing | A detention hearing was held for Ms. Maxwell, after which Mr. Boies commented on the proceedings. | court | View |
| 2020-07-01 | N/A | ABC News Interviews | On-air | View |
| 2019-09-03 | N/A | Court hearing regarding United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). Attorneys Boie... | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2019-07-24 | N/A | Court Hearing in Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2019-07-24 | Court proceeding | A court hearing where Mr. Boies is providing information to the Court regarding a case against Mr... | Courtroom | View |
| 2019-07-24 | Court hearing | A court hearing for case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB where counsel and the judge discussed whether trustees... | Court in the Southern District | View |
| 2015-07-06 | N/A | Meeting regarding settlement discussions where Dershowitz claimed progress in convincing Boies of... | Unspecified | View |
DOJ-OGR-00001639.jpg
This legal document, dated July 21, 2020, discusses the case of Ms. Maxwell, focusing on the aftermath of her July 14 detention hearing. It details comments made by David Boies, counsel for an accuser named Farmer, who heavily criticizes Maxwell's 'blame the victim' defense strategy as a 'dangerous tactic'. Boies recounts Farmer's testimony and another story about a 16-year-old named Annie being fraudulently lured by Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein to a ranch in New Mexico.
DOJ-OGR-00000699.jpg
This document is page 61 of a court transcript from September 3, 2019, concerning the case against Jeffrey Epstein. Attorney Mr. Boies briefly addresses the court to express pride in the women who came forward. Following him, attorney Kimberly Lerner introduces her client, Jennifer Aroz, to the court, describing Aroz as a brave survivor who initially thought she was the only victim, and explicitly characterizes Jeffrey Epstein as a predator and pedophile.
DOJ-OGR-00000581.jpg
This court transcript from July 24, 2019, captures a dialogue between a lawyer, Mr. Boies, and the Court. Mr. Boies describes a pattern in a case against Mr. Epstein where cooperating witnesses would cease cooperation after being contacted by Epstein or his lawyers, who would provide them with legal counsel. These events coincided with unspecified payments, leading the Court to infer they were made to silence people.
DOJ-OGR-00000580.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019, detailing a discussion between a judge and several lawyers. The conversation covers an agreement between the U.S. Attorney and defense counsel regarding whether trustees or guards will be armed. Attorney Mr. Boies, representing a victim, interrupts to clarify that payments of $250,000 and $100,000 were made by the defendant at a time when a legal proceeding was pending, contradicting a prior statement by the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00000577.jpg
This is page 67 of a court transcript from July 24, 2019, in the case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. The proceedings involve a discussion regarding victims wishing to be heard, with Mr. Boies present to represent them. Defense attorney Mr. Weinberg clarifies that Epstein does not concede the government's evidence and intends to mount a defense.
DOJ-OGR-00000437.jpg
This legal document, dated July 16, 2019, is a filing addressed to Hon. Richard M. Berman. It argues two points on behalf of Epstein: first, that certain individuals were not cooperating witnesses but rather long-time friends and employees who invoked the Fifth Amendment in prior civil proceedings, and second, that an expired Austrian passport acquired by Epstein in the 1980s was for personal protection during travel and there is no evidence it was ever used.
DOJ-OGR-00000436.jpg
This document is page 6 of a legal filing dated July 16, 2019, addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman. The author refutes the judge's suggestion that sex offender recidivism rates increase after 15 years, citing two studies that conclude the opposite. The document also mentions a New Mexico detective, Deborah Anaya, and speculation by a third-party counsel, Mr. Boies, regarding alleged payments in late 2018.
DOJ-OGR-00002360.jpg
This legal document, filed on February 4, 2021, argues that the government's prior representations about its investigation were false. It details how attorneys from Boies Schiller, including David Boies himself, approached the government in 2016 to urge an investigation into Epstein and Maxwell for sex trafficking and perjury, providing evidence from abused clients. A quote from David Boies highlights his firm's conviction that they could prove a "massive sex trafficking ring" was in operation.
DOJ-OGR-00002360(3).jpg
This legal document page, filed on February 4, 2021, argues that the government was aware of information beyond public filings when it began its investigation. It cites a February 29, 2016 meeting where attorneys from Boies Schiller urged AUSA Amanda Kramer to investigate Epstein and Maxwell, and a later approach in summer 2016 by David Boies himself asking the government to consider perjury charges against Maxwell. The document includes a quote from Boies stating they had evidence of a "massive sex trafficking ring."
DOJ-OGR-00002360(2).jpg
This legal document argues that the government's representations about when it began its investigation were false. It provides evidence that attorneys from the law firm Boies Schiller, including David Boies himself, approached the government in 2016 to urge an investigation into Epstein and Maxwell for sex trafficking and perjury, citing evidence from abused clients. A quote from David Boies details the extensive evidence they claimed to possess about a "massive sex trafficking ring."
DOJ-OGR-00002360(1).jpg
This legal document argues that the government's claims about when its investigation began were false. It provides evidence that attorneys from Boies Schiller met with AUSA Amanda Kramer on February 29, 2016, to urge an investigation into Epstein and Maxwell. Furthermore, it states that David Boies approached the government in the summer of 2016 to ask about charging Maxwell with perjury, quoting Boies on the extensive evidence they had of a "massive sex trafficking ring."
DOJ-OGR-00019495.jpg
This document is page 6 of a legal filing addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan on July 21, 2020, arguing that lawyers Boies and McCawley made prejudicial extrajudicial statements in ABC News interviews regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The filing quotes the lawyers describing Maxwell as a 'central figure' who 'worked hand-in-hand' with Epstein and suggesting other participants should be worried. The author requests a court order to prohibit further public comments that could damage Maxwell's right to a fair trial.
DOJ-OGR-00019494.jpg
This legal document, dated July 21, 2020, details arguments following Ghislaine Maxwell's detention hearing. It heavily features comments from David Boies, a lawyer for an accuser named Farmer, who criticizes Maxwell's potential 'blame the victim' defense strategy as counterproductive. Boies recounts his client's allegations, including a story about how Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein allegedly lured a 16-year-old girl named Annie to a ranch in New Mexico with fraudulent promises.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018033.jpg
This is page 4 of a signed affidavit by David S. Stone, dated April 5, 2019. Stone details a 2015 meeting where Alan Dershowitz attempted to convince attorney David Boies that Virginia Roberts (the client) was mistaken in her sexual allegations, suggesting she confused him with Nathan Myhrvold, who frequented Epstein's company. Stone attests that Boies never conceded the allegations were false and notes that Roberts passed a lie detector test.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016202.jpg
This document is the final page (page 6) of a sworn declaration by Paul G. Cassell, Esq., filed on July 3, 2019, in the civil case Giuffre v. Maxwell (implied by case number). Cassell asserts that a bar complaint filed by Alan Dershowitz against attorneys Boies and McCawley is frivolous and praises McCawley's devotion to representing sexual abuse victims. The document is notarized in Salt Lake County, Utah, and bears a House Oversight Committee stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016200.jpg
This document is a legal declaration refuting Alan Dershowitz's public claims that he never traveled without his wife and was never alone with Epstein and young women. The declarant provides specific flight log evidence from 1998, 2004, and 2005 showing Dershowitz on flights with Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, and other women, noting specifically that his wife was not listed on these manifests. The document also notes that Dershowitz had personal access to flight logs before they were turned over to law enforcement.
Witness cooperation and payments in a case against Mr. Ep...
Mr. Boies informs the court that witnesses who were cooperating stopped doing so after being contacted by Mr. Epstein or his lawyers. This happened at the same time that payments were being made, which the court infers were to keep people silent.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity