HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021932.jpg

1.34 MB

Extraction Summary

5
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Deposition transcript / legal proceeding (rough draft)
File Size: 1.34 MB
Summary

This document is a page from a rough draft deposition transcript (House Oversight). It details the legal strategy of a legal team (including the witness and co-counsel Mr. Edwards) regarding the decision in the Summer/Fall of 2014 to approach the U.S. Attorney's Office to add Virginia Roberts and Jane Doe 4 as parties to a case. The U.S. Attorney's Office declined this request, leading to a legal filing on December 30th.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Mr. Edwards Co-counsel
Worked with the witness to seek the joinder of Miss Roberts and Jane Doe 4.
Virginia Roberts Subject/Plaintiff
Referred to as 'Miss Roberts'; legal team sought to join her as a party to the case.
Jane Doe 4 Subject/Plaintiff
Anonymous individual; legal team sought to join her as a party to the case.
Speaker A Witness/Legal Counsel
Answering questions regarding legal strategy in 2014.
Speaker Q Interviewer/Attorney
Questioning the witness about timelines and decisions regarding adding plaintiffs.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
U.S. Attorneys's Office
Approached by counsel to get agreement to add Roberts to the case; they declined.
House Oversight Committee
Implied by the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021932'.

Timeline (2 events)

December 30th
Filing made after U.S. Attorney's Office declined to agree to add Roberts to the case.
Unknown
Legal Counsel
Summer 2014
Decision made by counsel to seek the joinder of Miss Roberts and Jane Doe 4 as parties.
Unknown
Witness Mr. Edwards

Relationships (2)

Witness (Speaker A) Co-counsel Mr. Edwards
Question refers to 'your co-counsel, Mr. Edwards'
Virginia Roberts Co-Plaintiffs (potential) Jane Doe 4
Counsel decided to seek the joinder of both as parties.

Key Quotes (3)

"It's true, is it not, that you and your co-counsel, Mr. Edwards, had decided to seek the joinder of Miss Roberts and Jane Doe 4 as parties no later than the Summer of 2014?"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021932.jpg
Quote #1
"I think we can call her Miss Roberts since the name is now known."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021932.jpg
Quote #2
"And they declined, which ultimately led to the filing on December 30th."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021932.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,200 characters)

109
1 I think that would be, you know, subject to the debate
2 which perhaps we are going to do now.
3 Q. No. Let's say you drew some inferences based
4 on information you had; is that fair to say?
5 A. Sure.
6 Q. Okay. It's true, is it not, that you and
7 your co-counsel, Mr. Edwards, had decided to seek the
8 joinder of Miss Roberts and Jane Doe 4 as parties no
9 later than the Summer of 2014?
10 A. Jane Doe 4, I think, give or take, yeah. I
11 think Jane Doe -- well, that's -- there's a nomenclature
12 issue. Let's refer to -- how do you want to refer to
13 Virginia Roberts? Shall we just call her --
14 Q. I think we can call her Miss Roberts since
15 the name is now known.
16 A. Right. Sure.
17 Q. And just clarifying, we can call Jane Doe 4.
18 We won't use that name, Jane Doe 4.
19 A. Right. I think sometime in the Summer or the
20 Fall the decision was made to -- to approach the U.S.
21 Attorneys's Office to get their agreement to add her
22 into the case. And they declined, which ultimately led
23 to the filing on December 30th.
24 Q. Okay. And the basis for my question was, I
25 believe I saw in a pleading that you had represented to
ROUGH DRAFT ONLY
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021932

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document