This document is a page from a rough draft deposition transcript (House Oversight). It details the legal strategy of a legal team (including the witness and co-counsel Mr. Edwards) regarding the decision in the Summer/Fall of 2014 to approach the U.S. Attorney's Office to add Virginia Roberts and Jane Doe 4 as parties to a case. The U.S. Attorney's Office declined this request, leading to a legal filing on December 30th.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Edwards | Co-counsel |
Worked with the witness to seek the joinder of Miss Roberts and Jane Doe 4.
|
| Virginia Roberts | Subject/Plaintiff |
Referred to as 'Miss Roberts'; legal team sought to join her as a party to the case.
|
| Jane Doe 4 | Subject/Plaintiff |
Anonymous individual; legal team sought to join her as a party to the case.
|
| Speaker A | Witness/Legal Counsel |
Answering questions regarding legal strategy in 2014.
|
| Speaker Q | Interviewer/Attorney |
Questioning the witness about timelines and decisions regarding adding plaintiffs.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| U.S. Attorneys's Office |
Approached by counsel to get agreement to add Roberts to the case; they declined.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021932'.
|
"It's true, is it not, that you and your co-counsel, Mr. Edwards, had decided to seek the joinder of Miss Roberts and Jane Doe 4 as parties no later than the Summer of 2014?"Source
"I think we can call her Miss Roberts since the name is now known."Source
"And they declined, which ultimately led to the filing on December 30th."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,200 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document