Page 395 of a deposition transcript (likely Prince Andrew based on context) stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015670. The witness denies under oath having sex with the subject (Virginia Roberts) and denies recalling receiving a waiver to allow a civil lawsuit. However, the witness states they offered to waive the statute of limitations for criminal purposes if a prosecutor found probable cause of an offense.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Witness (A.) | Deponent/Witness |
Person being questioned under oath; denies having sex with 'her' (Virginia Roberts) and discusses waiving statute of ...
|
| Mr. Edwards | Attorney |
Questioning the witness regarding a waiver of the statute of limitations.
|
| Special Master Pozzuoli | Special Master |
Legal official overseeing the deposition, intervening to ensure the question is answered.
|
| Virginia Roberts | Subject of inquiry/Plaintiff |
Mentioned as the person who might bring a lawsuit or with whom an offense might have been committed.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Phipps Reporting |
Court reporting agency listed in footer.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
"state under oath that I did not have sex with her"Source
"The question is, were you sent a waiver of the statute of limitations to sign so that Virginia Roberts could bring that lawsuit?"Source
"I don't believe that I was sent a -- something that would give her the opportunity -- a waiver to file that lawsuit."Source
"I would waive the statute of limitations for criminal purposes."Source
"If a prosecutor were to investigate this case and come to the conclusion that there was probable cause that I had committed any offense with Virginia Roberts, I would then waive the statute of limitations."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,154 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document